Poco X6 Pro vs Nothing Phone (2a): A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its significantly faster Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset and 67W charging provide a noticeable performance and convenience advantage. However, the Nothing Phone (2a) excels in battery optimization, making it a viable choice for those prioritizing longevity.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Nothing Phone (2a) | Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, March 05 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, March 12 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 161.7 x 76.3 x 8.6 mm (6.37 x 3.00 x 0.34 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, 700 nits (typ), 1100 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x 2.0 Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Pro (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC4 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades, Nothing OS 3.0 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes, 360˚ | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 23 min, 100% in 1 hour | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Milk, Blue | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | A142 | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | € 192.59 / $ 389.00 / ₹ 21,999 | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Nothing Phone (2a)
- Exceptional battery life (15:53h active use)
- Unique and minimalist design
- Efficient Dimensity 7200 Pro chipset
- Lower peak display brightness (981 nits)
- Slower charging speed (1 hour to 100%)
- Performance lags behind Poco X6 Pro
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Powerful Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset
- Faster 67W charging (100% in 45 min)
- Brighter display (1148 nits)
- Shorter battery life (11:46h active use)
- Potentially more thermal throttling under sustained load
- Software experience may be less refined
Display Comparison
Both phones utilize 4nm chipsets, but their displays differ significantly. The Poco X6 Pro boasts a brighter panel at 1148 nits, compared to the Nothing Phone (2a)'s 981 nits, making it more legible under direct sunlight. While both offer a smooth experience, the Poco’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor visibility. Details regarding panel technology (AMOLED vs LCD, refresh rate) are missing, but both are expected to deliver vibrant colors typical of the segment. Bezels are comparable, and without specific color accuracy data, it’s difficult to declare a winner in that regard.
Camera Comparison
The context data for the Poco X6 Pro only mentions 'Photo / Video,' lacking specifics on sensor size or resolution. However, given Xiaomi’s history, it’s likely to feature a high-resolution main sensor. The Nothing Phone (2a) lacks detailed camera specs in the provided data as well. Without knowing sensor sizes, apertures, or image processing algorithms, a definitive camera comparison is impossible. The presence of OIS on either device is unknown, but would be a significant advantage for video stabilization and low-light photography. We can assume both will include standard wide and ultrawide lenses, but details are lacking.
Performance
The Poco X6 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra is the clear performance leader. Its octa-core configuration, featuring a 3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 core and three additional 3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 cores, significantly outpaces the Nothing Phone (2a)'s Dimensity 7200 Pro (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x 2.0 Cortex-A510). This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance. The Poco’s CPU architecture, with more high-performance cores, provides a substantial advantage. While both utilize a 4nm process, the 8300 Ultra’s more advanced design delivers greater efficiency and sustained performance. RAM specifications are missing, but LPDDR5x is expected on both.
Battery Life
The Nothing Phone (2a) demonstrates superior battery efficiency, achieving an active use score of 15:53h, compared to the Poco X6 Pro’s 11:46h. This suggests the Dimensity 7200 Pro is more power-efficient. However, the Poco X6 Pro compensates with significantly faster 67W charging, reaching 100% in just 45 minutes, while the Nothing Phone (2a) takes a full hour to charge. The Poco’s charging speed is a major convenience factor, while the Nothing Phone (2a) prioritizes maximizing time between charges.
Buying Guide
Buy the Nothing Phone (2a) if you value a unique, minimalist design, a clean software experience, and prioritize all-day battery life over peak performance. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you're a power user who demands the fastest possible processing speeds for gaming or demanding applications, and appreciate significantly faster charging capabilities.