Nothing Phone (2a) vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and a longer battery life, the Nothing Phone (2a) is the better choice. Its Dimensity 7200 Pro chipset and optimized power efficiency translate to a significantly longer active use score of 15:53h, outweighing the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s faster charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Nothing Phone (2a) | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, March 05 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, March 12 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.7 x 76.3 x 8.6 mm (6.37 x 3.00 x 0.34 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, 700 nits (typ), 1100 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x 2.0 Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Pro (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC4 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades, Nothing OS 3.0 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes, 360˚ | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 23 min, 100% in 1 hour | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Milk, Blue | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | A142 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | € 192.59 / $ 389.00 / ₹ 21,999 | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Nothing Phone (2a)
- Superior CPU performance with Dimensity 7200 Pro
- Significantly longer battery life (15:53h active use)
- More efficient 4nm chipset
- Slightly lower peak display brightness
- Charging speed is slower than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Faster 68W wired charging
- Higher peak display brightness (1073 nits)
- Sleek and lightweight design
- Shorter battery life (10:28h active use)
- Less powerful Dimensity 7030 chipset
- Older CPU architecture
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant displays, but the Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a higher peak brightness of 1073 nits compared to the Nothing Phone (2a)’s 981 nits. This difference is noticeable in direct sunlight. However, the Nothing Phone (2a) doesn’t specify PWM frequency, while the Edge 40 Neo’s display technology is likely to offer a smoother experience. While both are excellent, the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness gives it a slight edge for outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
The provided data doesn’t offer detailed camera specifications for either device. However, given the market positioning, we can infer that both will rely heavily on software processing. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s marketing emphasizes its photo and video capabilities, suggesting a focus on image quality. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Edge 40 Neo’s marketing suggests a stronger emphasis on camera features. We'd need to see sample images to make a proper judgement.
Performance
The Nothing Phone (2a) is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Pro (4nm), while the Motorola Edge 40 Neo utilizes the Dimensity 7030 (6nm). The 4nm process node of the 7200 Pro offers superior power efficiency and thermal performance compared to the 6nm 7030. The CPU architecture also favors the Nothing Phone (2a), with its Cortex-A715 cores clocked at 2.8 GHz versus the Edge 40 Neo’s Cortex-A78 cores at 2.5 GHz. This translates to better multi-core performance and sustained speeds during gaming and demanding applications. The Edge 40 Neo’s CPU is older generation, impacting long-term performance.
Battery Life
The Nothing Phone (2a) delivers a significantly longer active use battery life of 15:53h, compared to the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s 10:28h. While the Edge 40 Neo compensates with 68W wired charging (50% in 15 minutes), the Nothing Phone (2a)’s 45W charging (50% in 23 minutes) is adequate, and the larger battery capacity provides a more substantial real-world advantage. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s older endurance rating of 80h is less relevant than the measured active use score.
Buying Guide
Buy the Nothing Phone (2a) if you need a phone that can reliably last through a full day of heavy use and offers a more powerful processor for demanding tasks. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize a slimmer profile, faster charging speeds, and a slightly brighter display, and are willing to trade some battery life and sustained performance for those features.