Nokia XR20 vs Nokia X30: A Head-to-Head Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Nokia X30 offers a brighter display, faster charging, and a more powerful chipset, making it the better all-around performer. However, the XR20's rugged design and enhanced durability make it ideal for those prioritizing resilience and outdoor use. It's a trade-off between performance and protection.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Nokia XR20 | Nokia X30 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 2, 5, 25, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 27 | 2022, September 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August 04 | Available. Released 2022, September 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 171.6 x 81.5 x 10.6 mm (6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 in) | 158.9 x 73.9 x 8 mm (6.26 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 248 g (8.75 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 60 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~76.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 550 nits | AMOLED, 90Hz, 450 nits (typ), 700 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 - 128GB UFS 3.0 - 256GB | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.25", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06" |
| Features | Zeiss optics, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, second LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio, RDS |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired 15W wireless | 33W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 4630 mAh | Li-Po 4200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Ultra Blue, Granite Gray | Cloudy Blue, Ice White |
| Models | TA-1368, TA-1362 | TA-1450, TA-1443 |
| Price | About 270 EUR | $ 399.00 |
| SAR EU | 1.13 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) | 0.79 W/kg (head) 1.37 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 94h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 403732 (v9) GeekBench: 1920 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Nokia XR20
- Extremely durable and rugged
- Water and dust resistant (IP68)
- 5G connectivity
- Clean Android experience
- Repairable design
- Less powerful chipset
- Slower charging
- Dimmer display
- Bulkier design
Nokia X30
- Brighter display
- Faster charging (33W)
- More powerful chipset (Snapdragon 695 5G)
- Wireless charging
- Modern design
- Less rugged than XR20
- Potentially less repairable
- May lack the same level of dust/water resistance
Display Comparison
The Nokia X30 boasts a significantly brighter display at 746 nits (measured), offering better visibility in sunlight. While the XR20's display is adequate, it lacks the X30's vibrancy and outdoor usability. The X30's 'infinite' contrast ratio is a nominal claim, but suggests a generally good visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable cameras, but the X30 likely has an edge due to the more powerful processor assisting image processing. Specific camera specs are not detailed, but the X30's chipset should allow for better low-light performance and video stabilization. Both are expected to deliver Nokia's signature clean and natural image processing.
Performance
The X30's Snapdragon 695 5G chipset (6nm) provides a noticeable performance boost over the XR20's Snapdragon 480 5G (8nm). Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the X30. The X30's CPU architecture is also more modern and efficient.
Battery Life
Both phones share an impressive endurance rating of 94 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. However, the X30's 33W wired charging (with PD3.0 support) is considerably faster than the XR20's 18W wired charging. The X30 also supports 15W wireless charging, a feature absent on the XR20.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Nokia XR20? Users who prioritize durability, ruggedness, and a phone that can withstand harsh conditions (construction workers, outdoor enthusiasts). Who should buy the Nokia X30? Users seeking a more modern design, better performance, faster charging, and a brighter display for media consumption.