Nokia X30 vs. Nothing Phone (2): A Detailed Comparison of Performance, Battery, and Display

The Nokia X30 and Nothing Phone (2) represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Nokia X30 prioritizes longevity and sustainable materials, while the Nothing Phone (2) aims to disrupt with a unique design and a focus on performance. This comparison dives deep into the specifications to determine which device delivers the best overall experience.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Nothing Phone (2) is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset provides a substantial performance leap over the Nokia X30’s Snapdragon 695, coupled with faster charging and a brighter display. However, the Nokia X30 offers respectable battery endurance and a more affordable price point.

PHONES
Phone Names Nokia X30 Nothing Phone (2)
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71
5G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub61, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2022, September 012023, July 11
StatusAvailable. Released 2022, September 21Available. Released 2023, July 17
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame, plastic backGlass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame
Dimensions158.9 x 73.9 x 8 mm (6.26 x 2.91 x 0.31 in)162.1 x 76.4 x 8.6 mm (6.38 x 3.01 x 0.34 in)
SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight185 g (6.53 oz)201.2 g (7.09 oz)
 IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min)-
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass VictusCorning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density)1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density)
Size6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio)6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~87.2% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 90Hz, 450 nits (typ), 700 nits (peak)LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 1600 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
ChipsetQualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)
GPUAdreno 619Adreno 730
OSAndroid 12, upgradable to Android 13Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades, Nothing OS 3.0
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM
 UFS 2.2 - 128GB UFS 3.0 - 256GB-
Main Camera
Dual50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06"50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, panorama, HDR
Single16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm-
Video1080p@30/60fps4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, live HDR, OIS
Selfie camera
Features-HDR
Single16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack No-
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker YesYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1), NavIC
RadioFM radio, RDSNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass
Battery
Charging33W wired, PD3.045W wired, PD3.0, PPS, QC4, 100% in 55 min 15W wireless, 100% in 130 min 5W reverse wireless
TypeLi-Po 4200 mAhLi-Ion 4700 mAh
Misc
ColorsCloudy Blue, Ice WhiteWhite, Dark Gray
ModelsTA-1450, TA-1443A065
Price$ 399.00$ 379.99 / £ 370.00
SAR EU0.79 W/kg (head)     1.37 W/kg (body)-
Tests
Battery life Endurance rating 94h -
Camera Photo / Video-
Display Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)-
Loudspeaker -27.5 LUFS (Good) -
Performance AnTuTu: 403732 (v9) GeekBench: 1920 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)-

Nokia X30

  • Excellent battery endurance (94h rating)
  • More affordable price point
  • Focus on sustainability and durable build

  • Significantly weaker performance compared to the Nothing Phone (2)
  • Less vibrant and potentially lower-quality display
  • Slower charging speeds

Nothing Phone (2)

  • Flagship-level performance with Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  • Brighter and smoother 120Hz OLED display
  • Faster charging speeds (wired and wireless)

  • Higher price tag
  • Slightly lower endurance rating (103h)
  • More complex software experience (Glyph Interface)

Display Comparison

The Nothing Phone (2) boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 998 nits measured, compared to the Nokia X30’s 746 nits. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While both displays share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, the Nothing Phone (2)'s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage. The Nokia X30’s display specifications lack details regarding refresh rate or panel technology, suggesting a standard 60Hz LCD, while the Nothing Phone (2) is confirmed to have a 120Hz OLED panel, offering smoother scrolling and animations.

Camera Comparison

Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. However, given the Nothing Phone (2)'s positioning, it's reasonable to expect a more advanced camera system with larger sensors and improved image processing. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is significantly more capable than the one found in the Snapdragon 695, resulting in better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the Nothing Phone (2) likely offers a more versatile and higher-quality camera experience.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Nothing Phone (2) is powered by the Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm), featuring an octa-core CPU with a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz. This is a flagship-level processor. Conversely, the Nokia X30 utilizes the Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), an octa-core CPU with a maximum clock speed of 2.2 GHz. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers superior power efficiency and thermal performance, meaning the Nothing Phone (2) will sustain peak performance for longer periods. The Nothing Phone (2) will handle demanding tasks like gaming and video editing with ease, while the Nokia X30 will likely struggle with more intensive applications.

Battery Life

The Nokia X30 has an endurance rating of 94 hours, while the Nothing Phone (2) achieves 103 hours. However, endurance ratings don't tell the whole story. The Nothing Phone (2) achieves an active use score of 14:21 hours, demonstrating strong real-world performance. The Nokia X30’s 33W wired charging with PD3.0 is adequate, but the Nothing Phone (2) offers significantly faster 45W wired charging (PD3.0, PPS, QC4) reaching 100% in 55 minutes, alongside 15W wireless charging and 5W reverse wireless charging – features absent on the Nokia X30.

Buying Guide

Buy the Nokia X30 if you need a durable, long-lasting phone with a focus on software simplicity and a commitment to sustainability, and are comfortable with a more modest performance profile. Buy the Nothing Phone (2) if you prioritize speed, a vibrant display, faster charging, and a more premium overall experience, even if it comes at a higher cost.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Nokia X30 struggle with graphically demanding games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Snapdragon 695 is a mid-range chipset and will likely struggle to run Genshin Impact at high settings. Expect significant frame rate drops and potential overheating. The Nothing Phone (2)'s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is far better equipped to handle such games smoothly.
❓ How does the Nothing Phone (2)'s Glyph Interface impact battery life?
The Glyph Interface, while visually striking, does consume some battery power. However, Nothing has optimized it to minimize the impact. Users can customize the Glyph Interface to only activate for essential notifications, reducing battery drain. The overall impact is relatively minor compared to the phone's large battery capacity and efficient chipset.
❓ Is the Nokia X30's software experience significantly cleaner than the Nothing Phone (2)'s Nothing OS?
The Nokia X30 runs a near-stock version of Android, offering a very clean and uncluttered software experience. Nothing OS, while also aiming for simplicity, includes unique features like the Glyph Interface and custom widgets. Users who prefer a minimalist approach will likely prefer the Nokia X30, while those seeking a more distinctive experience may prefer Nothing OS.