Nokia's legacy spans decades, producing phones for every budget. We're pitting two vastly different Nokias against each other: the incredibly affordable X2-00, a feature phone, and the modern smartphone, the X30. This comparison explores their strengths and weaknesses to help you decide which is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Nokia X30 is the clear winner for most users. Its 5G connectivity, modern features, and superior camera are unmatched by the X2-00. However, the X2-00 remains a compelling option for those prioritizing extreme affordability and basic calling/texting functionality.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | - | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| EDGE | Class 32 | - |
| GPRS | Class 32 | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2010, April. Released 2010, July | 2022, September 01 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, September 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 111 x 47 x 13.3 mm, 61 cc (4.37 x 1.85 x 0.52 in) | 158.9 x 73.9 x 8 mm (6.26 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Mini-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 81 g (2.86 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~182 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 2.2 inches, 15.0 cm2 (~28.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT, 256K colors | AMOLED, 90Hz, 450 nits (typ), 700 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | - | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | - | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | - | Adreno 619 |
| OS | - | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | Yes | - |
| Card slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot), 2 GB included | No |
| Internal | 48MB 128MB ROM 64MB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Phonebook | 1000 entries, Photocall | - |
| | - | UFS 2.2 - 128GB
UFS 3.0 - 256GB |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06" |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 320p@18fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| | No | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| | Dedicated music keys | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 2.1, A2DP | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | - | Yes |
| Positioning | No | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio, RDS; built-in antenna | FM radio, RDS |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | No | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | WAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML, Adobe Flash Lite | - |
| Games | Bounce Tales, City Bloxx, Snake III, Block'd, Diamond Rush, Rally 3D, Brain Champion, Sudoku | - |
| Java | Yes, MIDP 2.1 | - |
| Messaging | SMS, MMS, Email, Push Email, IM | - |
| Sensors | - | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | MP4/H.263 player
MP3/WMA/eAAC+ player
Organizer
Photo editor
Voice memo
Predictive text input | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 33W wired, PD3.0 |
| Music play | Up to 27 h | - |
| Stand-by | Up to 624 h | - |
| Talk time | Up to 13 h 30 min | - |
| Type | Removable Li-Ion 860 mAh battery (BL-4C) | Li-Po 4200 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Red on Black, Blue on SIlver | Cloudy Blue, Ice White |
| Models | - | TA-1450, TA-1443 |
| Price | About 40 EUR | $ 399.00 |
| SAR | 1.28 W/kg (head) 0.89 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.82 W/kg (head) | 0.79 W/kg (head) 1.37 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality |
Noise -85.7dB / Crosstalk -85.6dB | - |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 94h
|
| Camera |
Photo |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
Voice 80dB / Noise 75dB / Ring 84dB
|
-27.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 403732 (v9)
GeekBench: 1920 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Nokia X2-00
- Extremely affordable
- Long battery life (standby)
- Durable design
- Simple and easy to use
- Basic functionality
- Low-resolution display
- Limited camera capabilities
- No internet browsing (limited)
Nokia X30
- 5G connectivity
- Modern smartphone features
- Good camera quality (photo/video)
- Bright and vibrant display
- Fast charging (33W)
- More expensive than X2-00
- Battery life, while good, not as extreme as X2-00 standby
- Snapdragon 695 can be mid-range in performance
Display Comparison
The Nokia X30 boasts a significantly larger and brighter display (746 nits) with a high contrast ratio, offering a vibrant and immersive viewing experience. The X2-00 has a small, basic QVGA screen, suitable only for simple text and icons. The X30's display is a clear winner.
Camera Comparison
The X30 offers both photo and video capabilities, likely with a higher resolution and improved image processing. The X2-00 has a basic photo camera, likely with limited resolution and features. The X30's camera is far more versatile and capable.
Performance
The X30's Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G chipset and Octa-core CPU provide a substantial performance advantage over the X2-00's basic feature phone processor. The X30 handles multitasking and apps with ease, while the X2-00 is limited to basic functions. The X30 excels in performance.
Battery Life
Both phones boast impressive battery life, with the X30 achieving a remarkable 94h endurance rating. The X2-00, being a feature phone, likely offers even longer standby time due to its limited functionality. While both are good, the X30's endurance rating is noteworthy.
Buying Guide
The Nokia X2-00 is ideal for users needing a simple, durable phone for calls and texts, particularly in areas with limited network coverage or for those on a very tight budget. The Nokia X30 is for users wanting a modern smartphone experience with a good camera, 5G connectivity, and a larger display, willing to spend more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ What is the main difference between the Nokia X2-00 and X30?
The X2-00 is a basic feature phone, while the X30 is a modern smartphone with 5G, a better display, and a more powerful processor.
❓ Is the Nokia X30 worth the extra cost compared to the X2-00?
If you need smartphone features like internet browsing, apps, and a good camera, the X30 is definitely worth the investment. If you only need a phone for calls and texts, the X2-00 is a more budget-friendly option.
