Nokia X100 vs. Xiaomi Poco F4: A Detailed Comparison of 5G Phones
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco F4 is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 870 chipset provides significantly faster performance, a brighter display, and 67W fast charging, justifying the higher price. However, the Nokia X100 remains a viable option for those prioritizing a lower initial cost and basic 5G functionality.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Nokia X100 | Xiaomi Poco F4 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 20, 25, 26, 38, 39, 40, 41, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 09 | 2022, June 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 19 | Available. Released 2022, June 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 171.4 x 79.7 x 9.1 mm (6.75 x 3.14 x 0.36 in) | 163.2 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 217 g (7.65 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~78.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14.2 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide) 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC3 | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 38 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4470 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Blue | Moonlight Silver, Night Black, Nebula Green |
| Models | - | 22021211RG, 22021211RI |
| Price | About 220 EUR | ₹ 16,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.1 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 590961 (v8), 698586 (v9) GeekBench: 3190 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Nokia X100
- More affordable price point
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- Clean Android experience (typically Nokia's strength)
- Significantly slower processor
- Less vibrant display
- Slower charging speeds
Xiaomi Poco F4
- Powerful Snapdragon 870 processor
- Bright and vibrant display
- Ultra-fast 67W charging
- Higher price tag
- MIUI software can be polarizing
- Potentially more bloatware
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Poco F4 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1003 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Nokia X100. This difference translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While both displays likely utilize IPS LCD technology (given the price points), the Poco F4’s higher brightness and infinite (nominal) contrast ratio suggest a more visually engaging experience. The Nokia X100’s display specifications are not provided, making a detailed comparison difficult, but it’s reasonable to assume it will be less vibrant and harder to see outdoors.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the Poco F4’s higher overall processing power suggests superior image processing capabilities. The Nokia X100 likely relies on Qualcomm’s ISP within the Snapdragon 480, while the Poco F4 benefits from the more advanced ISP in the Snapdragon 870. It’s safe to assume the Poco F4 will deliver better image quality, particularly in low-light conditions, and more versatile video recording options.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Poco F4’s Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) is a significant upgrade over the Nokia X100’s Snapdragon 480 5G (8nm). The 870 features a Kryo 585 core clocked at 3.2 GHz, alongside a tri-cluster configuration, offering a considerable boost in CPU and GPU performance. The Snapdragon 480, while capable for basic tasks, will struggle with demanding games and multitasking. The 7nm process node of the Snapdragon 870 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during extended use. The Poco F4 is the clear winner for users who prioritize speed and responsiveness.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 101 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the Poco F4’s more powerful processor. This is likely due to optimizations in software and battery management. However, the Poco F4’s 67W wired charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC3, is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 38 minutes. The Nokia X100’s 18W charging with QC3 is significantly slower, requiring considerably more time to reach 100%. This difference in charging speed is a major convenience factor for Poco F4 users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Nokia X100 if you need a genuinely affordable 5G phone for essential tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media use, and aren't concerned with demanding gaming or intensive multitasking. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F4 if you prioritize smooth performance for gaming, video editing, or running multiple apps simultaneously, and value a brighter, more vibrant display alongside significantly faster charging speeds.