Nokia X100 vs OnePlus Nord 2T: Which Mid-Range Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord 2T is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 1300 chipset provides a substantial performance uplift over the Nokia X100’s Snapdragon 480, and the 80W SuperVOOC charging is a game-changer. While the Nokia X100 offers a lower entry price, the Nord 2T’s overall experience justifies the cost.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Nokia X100 | OnePlus Nord 2T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 20, 25, 26, 38, 39, 40, 41, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 09 | 2022, May 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 19 | Available. Released 2022, May 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 171.4 x 79.7 x 9.1 mm (6.75 x 3.14 x 0.36 in) | 159.1 x 73.2 x 8.2 mm (6.26 x 2.88 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 217 g (7.65 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~78.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, OxygenOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Auto HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC3 | 80W wired, PD |
| Type | Li-Po 4470 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Blue | Gray Shadow, Jade Fog |
| Models | - | CPH2399, CPH2401 |
| Price | About 220 EUR | € 144.39 / $ 169.99 / ₹ 31,490 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 100h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 490545 (v8) | 604467 (v9) GeekBench: 2790 (v5.1) GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Nokia X100
- More affordable price point
- Clean stock Android experience
- Potential for longer software support (Nokia's promise)
- Significantly weaker performance
- Slow charging speed
- Likely inferior display quality
OnePlus Nord 2T
- Much faster performance
- 80W SuperVOOC charging
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Higher price
- OxygenOS (may not appeal to stock Android purists)
- Potential for bloatware
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord 2T boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 636 nits, compared to an assumed lower brightness on the Nokia X100 (spec not provided). This makes the Nord 2T far more usable outdoors in direct sunlight. While both displays have an 'infinite' contrast ratio (nominal), the higher brightness of the Nord 2T contributes to a more visually impactful image. The Nokia X100’s display specs are not detailed enough to assess color accuracy or panel technology, but given its price point, it likely utilizes a less advanced panel than the Nord 2T.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but details are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning suggests the Nord 2T likely features a more advanced camera system. The Nokia X100, targeting a lower price bracket, likely employs more budget-oriented sensors. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device makes it difficult to assess low-light performance. It's safe to assume the Nord 2T's image processing will be more refined, offering better dynamic range and detail.
Performance
The performance gap between these two phones is substantial. The OnePlus Nord 2T’s Mediatek Dimensity 1300, built on a 6nm process, is a far more capable chipset than the Nokia X100’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (8nm). The Dimensity 1300’s octa-core configuration, featuring a high-clocked Cortex-A78 prime core, delivers significantly faster processing speeds for gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications. The Snapdragon 480, while adequate for basic tasks, will struggle with more intensive workloads. The 6nm node of the Dimensity 1300 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during prolonged use.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 100 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life under typical usage. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The OnePlus Nord 2T’s 80W SuperVOOC charging is a major advantage, allowing for a full charge in under 30 minutes. The Nokia X100’s 18W charging with QC3 is considerably slower, taking significantly longer to replenish the battery. This difference in charging speed dramatically impacts the user experience, especially for those who frequently need to top up their phone.
Buying Guide
Buy the Nokia X100 if you prioritize a stock Android experience, long-term software support, and are on a very tight budget. It’s a solid option for basic smartphone tasks. Buy the OnePlus Nord 2T if you value performance for gaming and demanding apps, incredibly fast charging, and a brighter, more vibrant display. It’s ideal for users who want a near-flagship experience without the flagship price.