Nokia X100 vs Nokia 8 V 5G UW: A 5G Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is the clear winner, boasting a significantly more powerful Snapdragon 765G chipset and a more refined overall experience. While the X100 is a budget-friendly option, the 8 V 5G UW delivers superior performance and a smoother user experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Nokia X100 | Nokia 8 V 5G UW |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 20, 25, 26, 38, 39, 40, 41, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 46, 66 |
| 5G bands | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA | 2, 5, 66, 260, 261 Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (4CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G 2.4/1.2 Gbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 09 | 2020, November 09. Released 2020, November 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 19 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 171.4 x 79.7 x 9.1 mm (6.75 x 3.14 x 0.36 in) | 171.9 x 78.6 x 9 mm (6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM (pre-installed) |
| Weight | 217 g (7.65 oz) | 230 g (8.11 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~78.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM |
| - | eMMC 5.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.43", 1.4µm, AF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | - |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/240fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Zeiss optics, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 24 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC3 | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4470 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Blue | Meteor Gray |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 590 EUR |
Nokia X100
- Large Display
- 5G Connectivity
- Affordable Price
- Nokia Reliability
- Lower Performance
- Slower Charging
- Less Refined Camera
- Basic Design
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
- Superior Performance
- Better Camera
- More Premium Design
- 5G Connectivity
- Higher Price
- 18W Charging (Slow)
- IPS LCD Display
Display Comparison
The Nokia X100 features a large 6.67-inch display, likely with a standard refresh rate (60Hz). The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a 6.3-inch display, potentially with a slightly higher refresh rate, offering a more responsive feel. Both likely use IPS LCD panels, providing good color accuracy but not the vibrancy of OLED.
Camera Comparison
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW likely has a more sophisticated camera system, potentially with a higher resolution main sensor and improved image processing capabilities. While both phones likely offer multiple lenses (wide, ultrawide, depth), the 8 V 5G UW's superior hardware and software should result in better image quality, especially in low light. The X100's camera is adequate for casual snapshots.
Performance
Here's where the 8 V 5G UW shines. Its Snapdragon 765G chipset is considerably faster than the X100's Snapdragon 480. Expect smoother app loading, better multitasking, and significantly improved gaming performance on the 8 V 5G UW. The X100 will handle everyday tasks adequately, but will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones likely have a battery capacity around 4470mAh. However, the 8 V 5G UW's more efficient chipset may result in slightly better battery life despite the higher performance. Both support 18W fast charging, which is relatively slow by modern standards.
Buying Guide
The Nokia X100 is ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize 5G connectivity and a large display for media consumption. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is for users who demand better performance for gaming, multitasking, and photography, and are willing to pay a premium.