Nokia X100 vs. Motorola Moto G50 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Motorola Moto G50 5G edges out the Nokia X100 thanks to its more efficient Dimensity 700 chipset, slightly better performance, and faster charging. While the X100 has a larger screen, the G50's overall package makes it the more compelling choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Nokia X100 | Motorola Moto G50 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Australia |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 20, 25, 26, 38, 39, 40, 41, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 - Australia |
| 5G bands | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Australia |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 09 | 2021, August 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 19 | Available. Released 2021, August 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 171.4 x 79.7 x 9.1 mm (6.75 x 3.14 x 0.36 in) | 167 x 76.4 x 9.3 mm (6.57 x 3.01 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 217 g (7.65 oz) | 206 g (7.27 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~78.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.8 cm2 (~80.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC3 | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4470 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Blue | Meteorite Grey |
| Models | - | XT2149-1 |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 170 EUR |
Nokia X100
- Larger Display
- Clean Android Experience
- Quad-Camera System
- Slower Performance
- Slower Charging
- Less Efficient Chipset
Motorola Moto G50 5G
- Better Performance
- Faster Charging
- More Efficient Chipset
- Modern Design
- Smaller Display
- Less impressive macro camera
Display Comparison
The Nokia X100 boasts a larger 6.67-inch display compared to the Moto G50's 6.5-inch screen. Both utilize IPS LCD panels, offering decent color accuracy and viewing angles. However, the X100's larger size might make it less comfortable for one-handed use. Resolution is similar, both offering HD+ displays.
Camera Comparison
The Nokia X100 features a quad-camera setup (48MP main, 5MP ultrawide, 2MP depth, 2MP macro) while the Moto G50 5G has a triple-camera system (50MP main, 8MP ultrawide, 2MP depth). Image quality is generally comparable in good lighting conditions, but the G50's larger main sensor often captures slightly more detail. Low-light performance is average on both devices.
Performance
Here, the Moto G50 5G takes a clear lead. The MediaTek Dimensity 700 (7nm) is more efficient and powerful than the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (8nm) found in the X100. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the G50. The X100's CPU, while adequate for basic tasks, will struggle with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones offer a substantial 5000mAh battery, promising all-day battery life. However, the Moto G50 5G's more efficient chipset allows it to stretch that battery life further. The X100's 18W charging is slower than the G50's 15W, adding to the G50's advantage.
Buying Guide
The Nokia X100 is a good option for those prioritizing a larger display and a cleaner Android experience. The Motorola Moto G50 5G is ideal for users seeking better performance, faster charging, and a more modern design, especially if gaming or multitasking are important.