Nokia X10 vs OnePlus Nord N20 5G: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord N20 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 695 chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Nokia X10’s Snapdragon 480. Coupled with faster 33W charging, the Nord N20 5G offers a smoother, more responsive experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Nokia X10 | OnePlus Nord N20 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 31, 41, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 2, 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat15 800/200 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Splash protection | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 08 | 2022, April 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 07 | Available. Released 2022, April 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Schott Xensation Up), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 168.9 x 79.7 x 9.1 mm (6.65 x 3.14 x 0.36 in) | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Schott Xensation Up |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~79.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits (typ) | AMOLED |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14 | Android 11, OxygenOS 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4470 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Forest, Snow | Blue |
| Models | TA-1350, TA-1332 | GN2200, CPH2459 |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 120 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.51 W/kg (head) 1.29 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 129h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 316974 (v8), 380672 (v9) GeekBench: 1945 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Nokia X10
- Potential for longer software support from Nokia.
- Reliable 5G connectivity with Snapdragon 480.
- Generally more affordable price point.
- Less powerful Snapdragon 480 chipset.
- Slower 18W charging.
- Display specifications are less impressive.
OnePlus Nord N20 5G
- More powerful Snapdragon 695 chipset for smoother performance.
- Faster 33W wired charging.
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility.
- OnePlus’s software update track record is less consistent than Nokia’s.
- May be slightly more expensive than the Nokia X10.
- Potential for more bloatware.
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord N20 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 647 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Nokia X10. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays have an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, the Nord N20 5G’s superior brightness is a clear advantage. The Nokia X10’s display specifications are less detailed, suggesting a more basic panel likely lacking features like high refresh rates found in some competitors.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications for the Nokia X10 are unavailable, making a direct comparison challenging. However, given its market positioning, it’s likely to feature a more modest camera setup. The OnePlus Nord N20 5G’s camera performance will likely benefit from the more powerful ISP within the Snapdragon 695. While megapixel counts aren’t everything, the processing power of the chipset plays a crucial role in image quality, especially in low-light conditions. We can assume the Nord N20 5G will deliver more refined image processing and potentially better dynamic range.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Nord N20 5G utilizes the Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G, fabricated on a 6nm process. This is a more advanced node than the 8nm process used for the Nokia X10’s Snapdragon 480. The 695 features a Kryo 660 Gold/Silver CPU configuration (2x2.2 GHz & 6x1.7 GHz) which offers a performance edge over the X10’s Kryo 460 (2x2.0 GHz & 6x1.8 GHz). This translates to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. The 6nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 129 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite differing charging speeds. However, the OnePlus Nord N20 5G’s 33W wired charging is a significant advantage over the Nokia X10’s 18W charging. This means the Nord N20 5G can replenish its battery much faster, reducing downtime. A full charge from 0-100% will be considerably quicker on the OnePlus device, a crucial benefit for users who prioritize convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Nokia X10 if you prioritize a brand known for software update commitment and are comfortable with a slightly less powerful processor. It’s a solid choice for basic smartphone tasks and reliable 5G connectivity. Buy the OnePlus Nord N20 5G if you value performance, faster charging, and a brighter display. It’s ideal for users who enjoy occasional gaming, streaming, and demand a more responsive user interface.