Nokia X10 vs. Nokia 8.3 5G: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Nokia 8.3 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 765G chipset, built on a more efficient 7nm process, provides a noticeable performance uplift in demanding tasks and gaming, justifying the potential price premium. However, the X10 remains a viable option for those prioritizing extreme budget constraints.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Nokia X10 | Nokia 8.3 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 31, 41, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (4CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G 2.4/1.2 Gbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Splash protection | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 08 | 2020, March 19. Released 2020, September 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 07 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 168.9 x 79.7 x 9.1 mm (6.65 x 3.14 x 0.36 in) | 171.9 x 78.6 x 9 mm (6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 220 g (7.76 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~79.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits (typ) | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, Android One |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 64GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.43", 1.4µm, AF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/240fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Zeiss optics, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 24 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4470 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Forest, Snow | Polar Night |
| Models | TA-1350, TA-1332 | TA-1243, TA-1251 |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 470 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.96 W/kg (head) 1.41 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.51 W/kg (head) 1.29 W/kg (body) | 0.96 W/kg (head) 1.41 W/kg (body) |
Nokia X10
- Most affordable 5G Nokia phone
- Decent performance for basic tasks
- Clean Android experience with guaranteed updates
- Noticeably slower performance than the 8.3 5G
- Less capable camera system
- 8nm chipset less power efficient
Nokia 8.3 5G
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 765G
- More efficient 7nm chipset for better battery life
- Improved camera image processing
- Higher price point than the X10
- May be harder to find in stock
- Still uses an LCD panel
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar LCD panels, given their market positioning. However, detailed display specs (resolution, brightness) are missing. The key difference lies in the processing power driving them. The 765G in the 8.3 5G will handle UI animations and video playback more fluidly. While neither is expected to boast high refresh rates, the 8.3 5G’s chipset will be less strained by the display, potentially leading to slightly better battery life during video consumption.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera sensor information, a direct comparison is limited. However, the image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 765G is more advanced than that of the 480. This means the 8.3 5G will likely exhibit better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. While both phones may feature similar megapixel counts for their main sensors, the 765G’s superior processing power will result in more detailed and visually appealing photos. The X10’s ISP will struggle to extract the same level of detail.
Performance
The core distinction between these devices is the chipset. The Nokia 8.3 5G’s Snapdragon 765G, fabricated on a 7nm process, offers a significant advantage over the X10’s Snapdragon 480 (8nm). The 765G’s Kryo 475 Prime core, clocked at 2.4 GHz, provides a substantial boost in single-core performance, crucial for app launch speeds and general responsiveness. The 480’s Kryo 460 cores, while octa-core, operate at lower frequencies. This translates to a more noticeable lag when switching between apps or running demanding applications on the X10. Gamers will find the 765G’s Adreno 620 GPU far more capable of handling graphically intensive titles at playable frame rates.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 18W wired charging, suggesting similar charging speeds. The actual battery capacity isn't specified, but the Snapdragon 765G’s 7nm process is more power-efficient than the 480’s 8nm node. This means the 8.3 5G will likely achieve comparable or even better battery life despite potentially having a similar capacity battery. The more efficient chipset reduces power draw during everyday tasks, extending usage time between charges.
Buying Guide
Buy the Nokia X10 if you need a truly budget-friendly 5G phone for basic tasks like browsing, social media, and light communication, and are willing to accept compromises in performance. Buy the Nokia 8.3 5G if you prioritize smoother multitasking, a more responsive gaming experience, and a generally more future-proof device, even if it means spending a bit more.