Nokia X10 vs. Motorola Moto G Power (2022): A Deep Dive into Budget Smartphone Choices
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing future-proofing and overall performance, the Nokia X10 emerges as the better choice. Its Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G chipset, built on an 8nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Motorola’s MediaTek Helio G37, despite the Moto G Power’s larger battery. The X10’s 5G capability adds long-term value.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Nokia X10 | Motorola Moto G Power (2022) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 25, 26, 29, 30, 38, 41, 66, 71 - USA |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 31, 41, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Splash protection | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 08 | 2021, November 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 07 | Available. Released 2022, February 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 168.9 x 79.7 x 9.1 mm (6.65 x 3.14 x 0.36 in) | 167.2 x 76.5 x 9.4 mm (6.58 x 3.01 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 203 g (7.16 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent coating | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~79.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~79.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | - |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio G37 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | - |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14 | Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| - | eMMC 5.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.65µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4470 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Forest, Snow | Black |
| Models | TA-1350, TA-1332 | - |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 70 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.51 W/kg (head) 1.29 W/kg (body) | - |
Nokia X10
- 5G Connectivity for faster data speeds
- More powerful Snapdragon 480 chipset
- Faster 18W charging
- Potentially better image processing
- May have a smaller battery capacity
- Potentially higher price point
Motorola Moto G Power (2022)
- Likely longer battery life with minimal use
- Potentially lower price point
- Simple and user-friendly interface
- Durable build quality (typical of Motorola)
- Slow 10W charging
- Less powerful Helio G37 chipset
- No 5G connectivity
- Limited long-term software support
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific display specs (resolution, panel type) are missing, the focus here is on the underlying chipset's ability to drive the display efficiently. The Nokia X10’s Snapdragon 480, with its more modern architecture, is likely to offer slightly better graphics rendering, potentially resulting in smoother animations. However, the difference will be minimal for typical usage.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the chipset plays a role in image processing speed. The Snapdragon 480’s image signal processor (ISP) is likely more advanced than the Helio G37’s, potentially resulting in faster image capture and better low-light performance on the Nokia X10. The absence of optical image stabilization (OIS) on either device suggests a reliance on software stabilization, where the Snapdragon 480’s processing power could again provide an advantage.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Nokia X10’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (8nm) significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Power (2022)’s MediaTek Helio G37 (12nm). The 8nm process node of the Snapdragon 480 translates to greater transistor density and improved power efficiency, leading to better sustained performance and less thermal throttling. The Snapdragon 480’s octa-core CPU (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) provides a more robust processing capability compared to the Helio G37. This means faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience on the Nokia X10. Users who engage in moderate gaming will find the Snapdragon 480 a more capable performer.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G Power (2022) likely has a larger battery capacity, a hallmark of the 'Power' line, but its 10W charging is a significant drawback. The Nokia X10’s 18W charging, while not exceptionally fast, offers a considerably quicker top-up time. The Snapdragon 480’s power efficiency also contributes to better battery life on the X10, partially offsetting the potential capacity difference. While the Moto G Power might last longer on a single charge with minimal use, the X10’s faster charging and efficient chipset provide a more balanced experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Nokia X10 if you need 5G connectivity for faster data speeds and anticipate using your phone for several years. It’s ideal for users who value a smoother user experience and occasional gaming. Buy the Motorola Moto G Power (2022) if your primary concern is maximizing battery life and you primarily use your phone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media. It’s a solid choice for those who rarely have access to a charger.