Nokia T20 vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad: The Ultimate Tablet Battle

The tablet market is booming, and budget options are increasingly appealing. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the Nokia T20 and the Xiaomi Redmi Pad. Both offer compelling features at accessible prices, but which one comes out on top?

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Xiaomi Redmi Pad edges out the Nokia T20 thanks to its significantly more powerful chipset, brighter display, and faster charging. While the Nokia T20 offers a clean Android experience and robust build, the Redmi Pad delivers a superior overall performance and value proposition.

PHONES
Phone Names	Nokia T20	Xiaomi Redmi Pad

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	N/A
3G bands	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - US, LATAM	N/A
4G bands	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 40, 66 - US, LATAM	N/A
EDGE	-	N/A
GPRS	-	N/A
Speed	HSPA, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps - cellular model only	-
Technology	GSM / HSPA / LTE	No cellular connectivity
	1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International	-

Launch
Announced	2021, October 06	2022, October 04
Status	Available. Released 2021, November 02	Available. Released 2022, October 05

Body
Build	Glass front, aluminum back	Glass front, aluminum frame
Dimensions	247.6 x 157.5 x 7.8 mm (9.75 x 6.20 x 0.31 in)	250.5 x 158.1 x 7.1 mm (9.86 x 6.22 x 0.28 in)
SIM	Nano-SIM (cellular model only)	No
Weight	465 g (Wi-Fi), 470 g (LTE) (1.03 lb)	465 g (1.03 lb)
	Splash resistant	-

Display
Protection	Scratch-resistant glass	-
Resolution	1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~224 ppi density)	1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~220 ppi density)
Size	10.4 inches, 307.9 cm2 (~78.9% screen-to-body ratio)	10.61 inches, 320.4 cm2 (~80.9% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ)	IPS LCD, 1B colors, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ)

Platform
CPU	Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)	Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
Chipset	Unisoc T610 (12 nm)	Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm)
GPU	Mali-G52 MP2	Mali-G57 MC2
OS	Android 11, upgradable to Android 13	Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14

Memory
Card slot	microSDXC (dedicated slot)	microSDXC
Internal	32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM	64GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM
	eMMC 5.1	UFS 2.2

Main Camera
Features	LED flash	-
Single	8 MP, AF	8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF
Video	1080p@30fps	1080p@30fps

Selfie camera
Single	5 MP	8 MP, f/2.3, 105° (ultrawide)
Video	Yes	1080p@30fps

Sound
3.5mm jack	Yes	No
35mm jack	Yes	No
Loudspeaker	Yes, with stereo speakers	Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers)
	-	24-bit/192kHz audio

Comms
Bluetooth	5.0, A2DP, LE	5.2, A2DP, LE
NFC	No	No
Positioning	GPS - cellular model only	No
Radio	FM radio	No
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C, OTG
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct

Features
Sensors	Accelerometer	Accelerometer

Battery
Charging	15W wired	18W wired
Type	Li-Po 8200 mAh	Li-Po 8000 mAh

Misc
Colors	Deep Ocean	Graphite Gray, Moonlight Silver, Mint Green
Models	TA-1397, TA-1394, TA-1392	22081283G
Price	About 200 EUR	About 250 EUR
SAR	1.34 W/kg (body)	-
SAR EU	1.35 W/kg (body)	0.36 W/kg (body)

Tests
Display	-	Contrast ratio: 1529:1 (nominal)
Loudspeaker	-	-23.9 LUFS (Very good)
Performance	-	AnTuTu: 319077 (v9) GeekBench: 1852 (v5.1) GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

OUR TESTS
Display	1786:1 contrast ratio, 422 nits max brightness (measured)	1529:1 contrast ratio, 402 nits max brightness (measured)
Loudspeaker	-	-23.9 LUFS (Very good)
Performance	-	AnTuTu: 319077 (v9) GeekBench: 1852 (v5.1) GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Nokia T20

Clean Android experience
Guaranteed software updates
Durable build quality
Good for basic tasks

Underpowered chipset
Slower charging
Less vibrant display
Limited gaming capabilities

Xiaomi Redmi Pad

Powerful chipset for gaming and multitasking
Brighter display
Faster charging
Larger screen size
Better value for money

Software may include bloatware
Build quality not as premium as Nokia
Contrast ratio slightly lower

Display Comparison

The Xiaomi Redmi Pad boasts a slightly brighter display (402 nits vs 422 nits - a negligible difference) and a slightly lower contrast ratio (1529:1 vs 1786:1). However, the Redmi Pad's larger screen size (10.61 inches vs 10.36 inches) provides a more immersive viewing experience. Both displays are LCD panels, offering decent color accuracy for everyday use.

Camera Comparison

Camera quality is generally not a priority for tablets, but the Redmi Pad typically offers slightly better image quality due to its more advanced hardware. Both tablets feature modest rear cameras suitable for casual snapshots. Front-facing cameras are adequate for video calls.

Performance

This is where the Redmi Pad truly shines. The Mediatek Helio G99 chipset (6nm) is considerably more powerful than the Unisoc T610 (12nm) in the Nokia T20. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Redmi Pad. The Cortex-A76 cores in the Redmi Pad's CPU also contribute to improved performance.

Battery Life

Both tablets offer decent battery life, easily lasting a full day of moderate use. The Redmi Pad's 18W charging provides a faster charging experience compared to the Nokia T20's 15W charging.

Buying Guide

Who should buy the Nokia T20? Users prioritizing a clean, stock Android experience, long-term software support, and a durable build. Who should buy the Xiaomi Redmi Pad? Those seeking a more powerful tablet for gaming, media consumption, and multitasking, with a brighter screen and faster charging.