Nokia N800 vs Nokia N810: A Retro Internet Tablet Showdown

The Nokia N800 and N810 were groundbreaking devices, pioneering the concept of the internet tablet in the mid-2000s. These devices offered a unique blend of mobile connectivity, media consumption, and a surprisingly capable web browsing experience for their time. But which one was truly superior?
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Nokia N810 edges out the N800 thanks to its slightly faster processor and improved software support during its lifespan. However, both offer a compelling glimpse into a bygone era of mobile computing and are cherished by retro tech enthusiasts. The N800's Kirin 990 chipset is a significant anomaly and likely a mistake in the provided specs.

PHONES
Phone Names Nokia N800 Nokia N810
Network
2G bandsN/AN/A
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41-
5G bands1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA-
EDGENoNo
GPRSNoNo
SpeedHSPA, LTE-A, 5G (2+ Gbps DL)-
TechnologyNo cellular connectivityNo cellular connectivity
Launch
Announced2007, January. Released 2007, Q22007, October. Released 2008, Q1
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
BuildGlass front, glass back, aluminum frame-
Dimensions144 x 75 x 13 mm (5.67 x 2.95 x 0.51 in)128 x 72 x 14 mm (5.04 x 2.83 x 0.55 in)
KeyboardQWERTYQWERTY
SIMNoNo
Weight206 g (7.27 oz)225 g (7.94 oz)
Display
ProtectionYes-
Resolution480 x 800 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~226 ppi density)480 x 800 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~226 ppi density)
Size4.13 inches, 48.5 cm2 (~45.0% screen-to-body ratio)4.13 inches, 48.5 cm2 (~52.7% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeTFT resistive touchscreen, 65K colorsTFT resistive touchscreen, 65K colors
Platform
CPU330 MHz400 MHz
ChipsetKirin 990 (7 nm)TI OMAP 2420
GPUMali-G76 MP16-
OSInternet Tablet OS 2007 editionInternet Tablet OS 2008 edition
Memory
Card slotmicroSD (dedicated slot)miniSD, up to 8 GB
Internal128MB RAM, 256MB ROM128MB RAM, 256MB ROM, 2GB
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panorama-
SingleYesVGA
Triple40 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/1.7", PDAF, Laser AF 8 MP, f/2.4, 80mm (telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.4, 16mm (ultrawide)-
Video352x288352x288
Selfie camera
Dual32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide)-
FeaturesHDR-
Video1080p@30fps-
 NoNo
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth2.0, EDR2.0, EDR
NFCYes-
PositioningNoGPS
RadioNoNo
USB2.02.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/gWi-Fi 802.11 b/g
Features
BrowserHTML, Adobe FlashHTML, Adobe Flash
 MP3/AAC/WAV/WMA player MP4/H.264 player Organizer Document viewerMP3/AAC/WAV/WMA player MP4/H.264 player Organizer Document viewer
Battery
Charging40W wired, 70% in 30 min (advertised)-
Stand-byUp to 312 hUp to 336 h
Talk timeUp to 3 h 30 minUp to 4 h
TypeRemovable Li-Ion (BP-5L)Removable Li-Ion 1500 mAh battery (BP-4L)
Misc
ColorsSilver, BlackSilver, Black

Nokia N800

  • Unique design and form factor
  • Historical significance as an early internet tablet
  • Good OLED display for its time

  • Slower processor compared to N810
  • Limited software support now
  • Poor camera quality
  • Unlikely Kirin 990 chipset specification

Nokia N810

  • Slightly faster processor
  • Better software support during its lifespan
  • Slightly better battery life
  • Improved screen brightness

  • Still limited software support now
  • Poor camera quality
  • Relatively expensive on the retro market

Display Comparison

Both devices featured a 4.1-inch OLED display, a rarity at the time. While the resolution was modest by today's standards (800x480), the OLED technology provided vibrant colors and excellent contrast. The N810 had a slightly brighter screen, offering better visibility in sunlight.

Camera Comparison

Both devices included a 2-megapixel camera, which was underwhelming even for the time. Image quality was poor, and the cameras were primarily intended for video conferencing rather than serious photography. There's no significant difference in camera performance between the two.

Performance

The N810 boasted a 400 MHz TI OMAP 2420 processor, a marginal improvement over the N800's reported 330 MHz Kirin 990 (which is highly improbable and likely an error – the Kirin 990 is a modern, high-performance chipset). In practice, the N810 felt slightly snappier when browsing and multitasking. The N800's performance was adequate for its intended use, but could feel sluggish at times.

Battery Life

The N800 had a 1200 mAh battery, while the N810 had a slightly larger 1500 mAh battery. Battery life was generally decent, providing several hours of web browsing or media playback. The N810 offered slightly longer battery life, but both devices required frequent charging.

Buying Guide

The Nokia N800 is ideal for collectors and those fascinated by the early days of mobile internet, appreciating its unique design and historical significance. The Nokia N810 is better suited for users seeking a slightly more functional experience, particularly if they can find software and community support. Both are niche purchases.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Are Nokia N800 and N810 worth buying today?
They are primarily valuable for collectors and enthusiasts interested in retro technology. Don't expect modern smartphone functionality.
❓ Can I still find software and support for these devices?
Software support is limited, but a dedicated community still exists. Finding compatible software can be challenging.
❓ What was the Kirin 990 chipset doing in the Nokia N800?
The Kirin 990 chipset specification is almost certainly an error. It's a modern, high-performance chipset that was not available during the N800's production.