Nokia's legacy is rich with iconic phones. Today, we pit two of them against each other: the Lumia 925, a beloved Windows Phone, and the 8 Sirocco, a sleek Android flagship. Can the older model still compete with modern technology, or is the Sirocco's power undeniable?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Nokia 8 Sirocco decisively wins. While the Lumia 925 boasts a beautiful design and a unique Windows Phone experience, the Sirocco's superior performance, modern features like wireless charging, and significantly improved camera make it the clear victor for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - all versions | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - RM-892 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20 - RM-892 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat3 100/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat12 600/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| | 2, 4, 5, 17 - RM-893 | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2013, May. Released 2013, June | 2018, February 25. Released 2018, April 23 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), stainless steel frame |
| Dimensions | 129 x 70.6 x 8.5 mm, 78 cc (5.08 x 2.78 x 0.33 in) | 140.9 x 73 x 7.5 mm (5.55 x 2.87 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Micro-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 139 g (4.90 oz) | 177 g (6.24 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 768 x 1280 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~332 ppi density) | 1440 x 2560 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~534 ppi density) |
| Size | 4.5 inches, 57.6 cm2 (~63.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~81.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | P-OLED |
| | PureMotion HD+ ClearBlack display | Always-on display |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Dual-core 1.5 GHz Krait | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Kryo & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8960 Snapdragon S4 Plus | Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 (10 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 225 | Adreno 540 |
| OS | Microsoft Windows Phone 8, upgradable to 8.1 | Android 8.0 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 10, Android One |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 16GB 1GB RAM, 32GB 1GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF
13 MP, f/2.6, (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, AF, 2x optical zoom |
| Features | Carl Zeiss optics, dual-LED flash | Zeiss optics, dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, 1/3.0", AF, OIS | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 1.3 MP | 5 MP, f/2.0, 1/4.0", 1.4µm |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
|
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP, EDR, LE/ aptX after WP8 Denim update | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, DLNA, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired, QC4
Wireless (Qi) |
| Music play | Up to 55 h | Up to 11 h |
| Stand-by | Up to 440 h (3G) | Up to 495 h (3G) |
| Talk time | Up to 18 h 20 min (2G) / Up to 12 h 40 min (3G) | Up to 22 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Ion 2000 mAh, non-removable (BL-4YW) | Li-Ion 3260 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Gray | Black |
| Models | - | TA-1005 |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 1010 EUR |
| SAR | 1.42 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.81 W/kg (head) | 0.59 W/kg (head) 1.54 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality |
Noise -82.5dB / Crosstalk -81.2dB |
Noise -90.1dB / Crosstalk -88.7dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 77h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) / 3.402:1 (sunlight) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal), 3.745 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker |
Voice 63dB / Noise 72dB / Ring 66dB
|
Voice 83dB / Noise 76dB / Ring 80dB
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 209577 (v7)
GeekBench: 6725 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Nokia Lumia 925
- Classic Windows Phone design
- Compact size
- Good build quality
- Outdated hardware
- Limited app availability
- Poor performance compared to modern phones
- No fast charging
- No wireless charging
Nokia 8 Sirocco
- Powerful Snapdragon 835 processor
- Excellent camera
- Modern Android features
- Fast charging (QC4)
- Wireless charging (Qi)
- Larger display
- Battery life could be better (though still good)
- Design can be considered a bit generic
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays with impressive contrast ratios (nominally infinite, around 3.4-3.7 in sunlight). However, the 8 Sirocco's display is likely brighter and more color-accurate due to advancements in display technology. The Lumia 925's screen is smaller (4.5 inches vs 5.5 inches) and has a lower resolution.
Camera Comparison
While both offer 'Photo/Video' capabilities, the 8 Sirocco's camera is vastly superior. Expect better image quality, improved low-light performance, and more advanced features like HDR and portrait mode. The Lumia 925's camera was decent for its time, but it's no match for the Sirocco's hardware and software.
Performance
The Sirocco's Snapdragon 835 is a massive upgrade over the Lumia 925's Snapdragon S4 Plus. The octa-core processor and 10nm manufacturing process provide significantly faster performance, smoother multitasking, and better gaming capabilities. The Lumia 925 feels sluggish by comparison.
Battery Life
The Nokia 8 Sirocco boasts an endurance rating of 77 hours, suggesting significantly better battery life than the Lumia 925. The Sirocco also supports fast charging and wireless charging, features absent in the Lumia 925.
Buying Guide
The Nokia Lumia 925 is for nostalgia seekers and those deeply invested in the Windows Phone ecosystem (if they can still find apps!). The Nokia 8 Sirocco is for Android users wanting a premium, compact phone with a great camera and solid performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Lumia 925 still usable in 2024?
Yes, but its limited app selection and outdated hardware make it less practical than modern smartphones. It's best suited for nostalgia or specific Windows Phone enthusiasts.
❓ Which phone is more durable?
Both phones have good build quality, but the 8 Sirocco's Gorilla Glass display offers better scratch resistance.
