Remember the days of Nokia dominating the mobile landscape? The Lumia 800 and 600 were both popular choices, offering a blend of functionality and affordability. But which one truly held the edge? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to settle the score.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Nokia Lumia 800 takes the crown. Its superior Snapdragon processor, higher resolution display, and generally more premium feel give it a noticeable advantage over the Nokia 600, despite both being budget-friendly devices from their time.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - RM-819 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100 |
| Speed | HSPA 14.4/5.76 Mbps | HSPA 14.4/5.76 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA |
| | HSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100 - for Canada | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2011, October. Released 2011, November | 2011, August |
| Status | Discontinued | Cancelled |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 116.5 x 61.2 x 12.1 mm, 76.1 cc (4.59 x 2.41 x 0.48 in) | 111 x 53 x 13 mm, 72 cc (4.37 x 2.09 x 0.51 in) |
| SIM | Micro-SIM | Mini-SIM |
| Weight | 142 g (5.01 oz) | 100 g (3.53 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | - |
| Resolution | 480 x 800 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~252 ppi density) | 360 x 640 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~229 ppi density) |
| Size | 3.7 inches, 39.0 cm2 (~54.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 3.2 inches, 28.2 cm2 (~48.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | TFT |
| | Nokia ClearBlack display
| - |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | 1.4 GHz Scorpion | 1.0 GHz |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8255 Snapdragon S2 | - |
| GPU | Adreno 205 | - |
| OS | Microsoft Windows Phone 7.5 Mango, upgradable to 7.8 | Symbian Belle OS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDHC (dedicated slot), 2 GB included |
| Internal | 16GB 512MB RAM | 2GB |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Carl Zeiss optics, dual-LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, AF | 5 MP |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 2.1, A2DP, EDR | 3.0, A2DP, EDR |
| NFC | - | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, A-GPS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio, RDS | Stereo FM radio, RDS; FM transmitter; built-in antenna |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| | MP3/WAV/eAAC+/WMA player
MP4/H.264/WMV player
Document viewer/editor
Video/photo editor | SNS integration
MP4/H.264 player
MP3/WAV/еAAC+/WMA player
Photo editor
Organizer
Voice command/dial
Predictive text input |
| Battery |
|---|
| Music play | Up to 55 h | Up to 60 h |
| Stand-by | Up to 265 h (2G) / Up to 335 h (3G) | Up to 540 h (2G) / Up to 600 h (3G) |
| Talk time | Up to 13 h (2G) / Up to 9 h 30 min (3G) | Up to 15 h (2G) / Up to 6 h 30 min (3G) |
| Type | Non-removable Li-Ion 1450 mAh battery (BV-5JW) | Removable Li-Ion 1200 mAh battery (BL-4J) |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Cyan, Magenta, White | Black, White, Pink and Lime |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 240 EUR |
| SAR | 1.27 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.94 W/kg (head) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality |
Noise -87.3dB / Crosstalk -87.8dB | - |
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 35h
| - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
Voice 60dB / Noise 59dB / Ring 61dB
| - |
| OUR TESTS |
|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -87.3dB / Crosstalk -87.8dB | - |
| Battery (old) | Endurance rating 35h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 60dB / Noise 59dB / Ring 61dB | - |
Nokia Lumia 800
- Faster Processor
- Better Display
- Slightly Longer Battery Life
- More Premium Build Quality
- Older Software
- Limited App Ecosystem (compared to modern smartphones)
- Basic Camera
Nokia 600
- More Affordable
- Compact Size
- Decent Battery Life
- Slower Processor
- Lower Resolution Display
- Less Premium Build
- Limited Features
Display Comparison
The Lumia 800 boasts a 3.7-inch AMOLED display, offering vibrant colors and excellent contrast (though the 'infinite' contrast ratio is a marketing term). The Nokia 600 has a smaller 3.2-inch LCD screen. While both are adequate, the Lumia 800's display is noticeably better in terms of clarity and visual appeal.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature basic camera setups. The Lumia 800 generally produces slightly better image quality due to its more advanced processing capabilities, but neither phone is a photography powerhouse by today's standards. Video recording is also present on both.
Performance
Here's where the Lumia 800 shines. Its Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 chipset with a 1.4 GHz Scorpion CPU provides a significant performance boost compared to the Nokia 600's 1.0 GHz processor. Apps launch faster, and multitasking is smoother on the Lumia 800.
Battery Life
The Lumia 800 has a slightly better endurance rating (35h) compared to the Nokia 600, suggesting a longer battery life in typical usage. However, both phones' batteries are relatively small by modern standards.
Buying Guide
The Nokia Lumia 800 is ideal for those seeking a slightly more powerful and feature-rich experience, even within a budget. The Nokia 600 is a good choice for users prioritizing affordability and a compact form factor, but are less concerned with performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Are these phones still usable today?
While functional, these phones are quite dated. Software updates are long gone, and app compatibility may be an issue. They're best suited for nostalgia or very basic tasks.
❓ Which phone is more durable?
Both phones were known for their relatively robust build quality, typical of Nokia devices. The Lumia 800 might have a slight edge due to its slightly more premium materials.
