Nokia Lumia 520 vs Nokia 8210 4G: A Budget Battle

Nokia's legacy continues with these two budget-friendly options: the Lumia 520, a Windows Phone classic, and the 8210 4G, a modern feature phone. Both offer affordability, but cater to different needs. This comparison dives deep to help you decide which is right for you.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Nokia 8210 4G wins overall, offering 4G connectivity, a more modern chipset, and improved features. While the Lumia 520 boasts impressive battery life and a surprisingly good display contrast, the 8210 4G's modern capabilities make it the better choice for most users.

PHONES
Phone Names Nokia Lumia 520 Nokia 8210 4G
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - all versionsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 900 / 2100 - RM-914HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - International
4G bands-1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20 - APAC, EU, RUCIS
SpeedHSPA 21.1/5.76 MbpsHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPAGSM / HSPA / LTE
 HSDPA 850 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100 - RM-9171, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 40 - LATAM
Launch
Announced2013, February. Released 2013, April2022, July 12
StatusDiscontinuedAvailable. Released 2022, July 28
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic back, plastic frame-
Dimensions119.9 x 64 x 9.9 mm, 75.7 cc (4.72 x 2.52 x 0.39 in)131.3 x 56.2 x 13.8 mm (5.17 x 2.21 x 0.54 in)
SIMMicro-SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight124 g (4.37 oz)107 g (3.77 oz)
Display
ProtectionScratch-resistant glass-
Resolution480 x 800 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~233 ppi density)240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~143 ppi density)
Size4.0 inches, 45.5 cm2 (~59.3% screen-to-body ratio)2.8 inches, 24.3 cm2 (~32.9% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDTFT LCD
Platform
CPUDual-core 1.0 GHz1.0 GHz Cortex-A7
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8227Unisoc T107 (22 nm)
GPUAdreno 305-
OSMicrosoft Windows Phone 8, upgradable to 8.1-
Memory
Call records-Yes
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDHC
Internal8GB 512MB RAM128MB 48MB RAM
Phonebook-Yes
Main Camera
Features-LED flash
Single5 MP, f/2.4, 28mm (wide), 1/4.0", AF0.3 MP
Video720p@30fpsUnspecified
Selfie camera
 NoNo
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth4.0, A2DP, LE/ aptX after WP8 Denim update5.0, A2DP, LE
NFCNoNo
PositioningGPS, GLONASSNo
RadioFM RadioWireless FM radio
USBmicroUSB 2.0microUSB 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspotNo
Features
Games-Yes
Java-No
Messaging-SMS, MMS
SensorsAccelerometer, proximity-
Battery
Music playUp to 61 h-
Stand-byUp to 360 h (3G)-
Talk timeUp to 14 h 40 min (2G) / Up to 9 h 40 min (3G)-
TypeLi-Ion 1430 mAh, removable (BL-5J)Li-Ion 1450 mAh, removable
Misc
ColorsYellow, red, cyan, white/blackSand, Blue, Red
Models-TA-1507, TA-1494, TA-1489, TA-1485, TA-1483
PriceAbout 70 EURAbout 170 EUR
SAR0.77 W/kg (head)0.98 W/kg (head)     1.34 W/kg (body)
SAR EU1.09 W/kg (head)0.98 W/kg (head)     1.43 W/kg (body)
Tests
Audio quality Noise -82.3dB / Crosstalk -81.8dB-
Battery life Endurance rating 49h -
Camera Photo / Video-
Display Contrast ratio: 834:1 (nominal) / 1.161:1 (sunlight)-
Loudspeaker Voice 68dB / Noise 69dB / Ring 66dB -

Nokia Lumia 520

  • Exceptional battery life (49h endurance)
  • Excellent display contrast (834:1 nominal, 1.161:1 sunlight)
  • Simple and reliable Windows Phone OS
  • Affordable

  • Outdated Windows Phone OS
  • Limited app availability
  • Basic camera
  • Slow performance

Nokia 8210 4G

  • 4G connectivity
  • Modern design
  • FM Radio
  • More recent chipset (Unisoc T107)
  • Affordable

  • Basic display quality
  • Limited performance
  • Basic camera
  • Feature phone functionality (limited smartphone features)

Display Comparison

The Lumia 520's display shines with an impressive 834:1 contrast ratio (and even better 1.161:1 in sunlight), offering vibrant colors and good visibility. The 8210 4G's display is a standard QVGA screen, adequate for its feature phone purpose but noticeably less impressive in terms of contrast and clarity. The Lumia 520 takes the display crown.

Camera Comparison

The Lumia 520 had a basic camera, capable of taking decent photos in good lighting. The 8210 4G also features a basic camera, likely with similar image quality. Neither phone excels in photography, but the Lumia 520's camera might offer slightly better results due to potentially better software optimization. It's a close call.

Performance

Here, the 8210 4G pulls ahead. While both phones have 1.0 GHz CPUs, the 8210 4G's Unisoc T107 chipset (22nm) is more efficient and modern than the Lumia 520's Qualcomm MSM8227. Expect smoother navigation and app loading on the 8210 4G, though neither phone is a powerhouse.

Battery Life

The Lumia 520's endurance rating of 49h is remarkable, showcasing its exceptional battery efficiency. The 8210 4G's battery life is respectable for a feature phone, but it doesn't match the Lumia 520's longevity. The Lumia 520 is the clear winner in battery performance.

Buying Guide

The Nokia Lumia 520 is ideal for users seeking a simple, reliable phone with exceptional battery life and a nostalgic Windows Phone experience. The Nokia 8210 4G is better suited for those needing 4G connectivity, basic smartphone features, and a more contemporary design.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is the Nokia Lumia 520 still worth buying?
If you prioritize battery life and a simple, nostalgic experience, the Lumia 520 can still be a viable option. However, the lack of updates and limited app availability are significant drawbacks.
❓ What are the key differences between the Nokia 8210 4G and a smartphone?
The 8210 4G is a feature phone, meaning it offers basic functionalities like calling, texting, and FM radio. It lacks the advanced features and app ecosystem of a smartphone.