The Nokia Lumia 510 and 530 were both entry-level Windows Phones aiming to deliver a taste of Microsoft's mobile OS on a budget. But with a few years separating their releases, how do they stack up against each other? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to see which phone offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Nokia Lumia 530 is the clear winner. While the 510 boasts impressive contrast ratios, the 530's more modern Snapdragon 200 chipset and quad-core processor provide a significantly smoother and faster user experience, making it the better choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| EDGE | Up to 236.8 kbps | - |
| GPRS | Up to 85.6 kbps | - |
| Speed | HSPA 7.2/0.384 Mbps | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA |
| | HSDPA 850 / 1900 - RM-898 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2012, October. Released 2012, November | 2014, July. Released 2014, August |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 120.7 x 64.9 x 11.5 mm, 81 cc (4.75 x 2.56 x 0.45 in) | 119.7 x 62.3 x 11.7 mm, 86.8 cc (4.71 x 2.45 x 0.46 in) |
| SIM | Micro-SIM | Micro-SIM |
| Weight | 129 g (4.55 oz) | 129 g (4.55 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 480 x 800 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~233 ppi density) | 480 x 854 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~245 ppi density) |
| Size | 4.0 inches, 45.5 cm2 (~58.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 4.0 inches, 44.1 cm2 (~59.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT, 65K colors | TFT |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | 800 MHz Cortex-A5 | Quad-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A7 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM7227A Snapdragon S1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 (28 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 200 | Adreno 302 |
| OS | Microsoft Windows Phone 7.8 | Microsoft Windows Phone 8.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | Yes | - |
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 4GB 256MB RAM | 4GB 512MB RAM |
| Phonebook | 1000 entries | - |
| | - | eMMC 4.5 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 5 MP, AF | 5 MP, 1/4.0" |
| Video | 480p@30fps | 480p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 2 MP | - |
| Video | 480p | - |
| | No | No |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 2.1, A2DP, EDR | 4.0, A2DP, LE/ aptX after WP8 Denim update |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio | FM Radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Games | Yes | - |
| Java | No | - |
| Messaging | SMS(threaded view), MMS, IM | - |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer |
| | SkyDrive (7 GB cloud storage)
MP3/WAV/eAAC+/WMA player
MP4/H.264/WMV player
Document viewer
Video/photo editor | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Music play | Up to 38 h | Up to 51 h |
| Stand-by | Up to 739 h (2G) / Up to 653 h (3G) | Up to 528 h |
| Talk time | Up to 6 h 15 min (2G) / Up to 8 h 25 min (3G) | Up to 13 h 20 min (2G) / Up to 10 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Ion 1300 mAh, removable (BP-3L) | Li-Ion 1430 mAh, removable (BL-5J) |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | White, Cyan, Black, Red, Yellow | Bright orange, Bright green, White, Dark grey |
| Price | About 110 EUR | About 100 EUR |
| SAR | 0.85 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) | 0.77 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.65 W/kg (head) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.19 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality |
Noise -79.4dB / Crosstalk -75.2dB | - |
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 44h
| - |
| Camera |
Photo | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 904:1 (nominal) / 1.268:1 (sunlight) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
Voice 67dB / Noise 66dB / Ring 76dB
| - |
Nokia Lumia 510
- Excellent contrast ratio
- Good battery endurance (44h)
- Compact size
- Slow performance
- Outdated chipset
- Basic camera
Nokia Lumia 530
- Faster processor (Snapdragon 200)
- More responsive user experience
- Slightly better camera
- Display details less readily available
- Still a budget phone with limitations
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 4-inch display, but the Lumia 510 stands out with a reported contrast ratio of 904:1 (nominal) and an impressive 1.268:1 in sunlight. The Lumia 530's display details are less readily available, but it's generally considered adequate for its price point. The 510's display is noticeably better in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature a basic camera, but the Lumia 530's camera is generally considered slightly better due to software improvements and the newer chipset's image processing capabilities. Both cameras are adequate for casual snapshots in good lighting conditions, but don't expect high-quality images.
Performance
This is where the Lumia 530 shines. Its Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 chipset with a quad-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A7 processor is a significant upgrade over the Lumia 510's 800 MHz Cortex-A5. Expect smoother app loading, faster web browsing, and a more responsive overall experience on the 530. The 510 can feel sluggish at times.
Battery Life
The Lumia 510 boasts an endurance rating of 44 hours, which is quite impressive. However, the Lumia 530's more efficient Snapdragon 200 chipset likely results in comparable real-world battery life despite potentially having a smaller battery capacity. Both phones offer decent battery performance for their class.
Buying Guide
The Nokia Lumia 510 might appeal to someone seeking a very basic, ultra-budget phone primarily for calls and texts, and who prioritizes display contrast. However, the Nokia Lumia 530 is the better option for anyone wanting a more responsive phone for basic apps and web browsing, even if it's still a budget device.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Nokia Lumia 510 still worth buying?
Only if you absolutely need a very basic phone and prioritize display contrast above all else. Otherwise, the Lumia 530 offers a much better experience.
❓ What operating system do these phones use?
Both phones run Windows Phone 8.1. However, updates are no longer supported for either device.