Nokia G60 vs Samsung Galaxy A34: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A34 emerges as the overall winner thanks to its significantly brighter display, superior camera capabilities, and faster charging. While the Nokia G60 offers a clean Android experience, the A34's improvements in key areas make it the more well-rounded choice.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Nokia G60 | Samsung Galaxy A34 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - LATAM | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 01 | 2023, March 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 01 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 166 x 75.9 x 8.6 mm (6.54 x 2.99 x 0.34 in) | 161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Splash resistant | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~82.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 400 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.5", 0.7µm, PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/5.0" Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 20W wired, PD3.0 | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pure Black, Ice Gray | Lime, Graphite, Violet, Silver |
| Models | TA-1490, TA-1481, TA-1479, TA-1475 | SM-A346E, SM-A346B, SM-A346B/DS, SM-A346B/DSN, SM-A346E/DS, SM-A346E/DSN, SM-A346M, SM-A346M/N, SM-A346M/DSN, SM-A3460 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | € 169.99 / $ 175.00 / £ 164.99 / ₹ 23,999 |
| SAR | 1.30 W/kg (head) 0.83 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 1.10 W/kg (head) 1.27 W/kg (body) | 0.55 W/kg (head) 1.49 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 133h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.1 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 472126 (v9) GeekBench: 2316 (v5.5), 2518 (v6) GFXBench: 23fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Nokia G60
- Brighter Display
- Superior Camera
- Faster Charging
- Excellent Battery Life
- Smooth Performance
- Potentially more Samsung bloatware
Samsung Galaxy A34
- Clean Android Experience
- Sustainable Design
- Good Battery Life
- Less Bright Display
- Weaker Camera
- Slower Charging
- Lower Performance
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A34 boasts a massive advantage in display brightness, reaching 1009 nits compared to the Nokia G60's 444 nits. This makes the A34 significantly easier to view outdoors. While the G60's 1523:1 contrast ratio is respectable, the A34's 'infinite' contrast (nominal) suggests excellent black levels. Both use AMOLED technology, offering vibrant colors.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy A34's camera system is a clear winner. While specific megapixel counts aren't provided, Samsung's image processing and overall camera features are generally superior. The A34 likely offers better low-light performance and more versatile shooting modes. The Nokia G60's camera is adequate but lacks the refinement of the A34.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A34's MediaTek Dimensity 1080 chipset generally outperforms the Nokia G60's Snapdragon 695 5G in real-world usage. The A34's Cortex-A78 cores provide a noticeable boost in responsiveness and multitasking. Both phones offer 5G connectivity and are capable of handling everyday tasks, but the A34 feels smoother overall.
Battery Life
Both phones offer excellent battery life, with the Galaxy A34 achieving an impressive endurance rating of 133h. The Nokia G60 also provides solid battery performance, though not quite at the A34's level. The A34's 25W charging is also slightly faster than the G60's 20W charging.
Buying Guide
The Nokia G60 is ideal for users prioritizing a clean, stock Android experience and a focus on sustainability. The Samsung Galaxy A34 is a better choice for those who value a vibrant display, a versatile camera system, and faster charging speeds.