Nothing Phone (2a) Plus vs Nokia G60: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus is the superior choice. Its significantly brighter 1097 nit display, coupled with the more powerful and efficient Mediatek Dimensity 7350 Pro chipset, and blazing-fast 50W charging, justifies the price premium over the Nokia G60.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Nokia G60 | Nothing Phone (2a) Plus |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - LATAM | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 01 | 2024, July 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 01 | Available. Released 2024, August 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 166 x 75.9 x 8.6 mm (6.54 x 2.99 x 0.34 in) | 161.7 x 76.3 x 8.5 mm (6.37 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Splash resistant | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~82.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 107.5 cm2 (~87.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 400 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, 700 nits (typ), 1100 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7350 Pro (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, Nothing OS 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.5", 0.7µm, PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/5.0" Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.76" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes, 360˚ |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 20W wired, PD3.0 | 50W wired, 50% in 21 min, 100% in 56 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pure Black, Ice Gray | Black, Grey |
| Models | TA-1490, TA-1481, TA-1479, TA-1475 | A142P |
| Price | About 240 EUR | € 269.90 / ₹ 22,599 |
| SAR | 1.30 W/kg (head) 0.83 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 1.10 W/kg (head) 1.27 W/kg (body) | - |
Nokia G60
- More affordable price point
- Sustainable design and software support
- Clean Android experience
- Significantly slower charging
- Less powerful processor
- Dimmer display
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
- Much faster 50W charging
- More powerful and efficient processor
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Longer battery life (based on active use score)
- Higher price tag
- Potentially more complex software experience (Nothing OS)
Display Comparison
The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus boasts a considerably brighter display, reaching a measured 1097 nits, compared to the Nokia G60’s 444 nits. This difference translates to vastly improved visibility outdoors and a more engaging viewing experience in bright environments. While both displays offer adequate clarity, the Nokia G60’s lower peak brightness may struggle in direct sunlight. Contrast ratios are also different, with the Nokia G60 at 1523:1, but the overall impact of the brightness difference is more noticeable in daily use.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus, positioned as a more premium device, likely benefits from a more advanced image signal processor (ISP) within the Dimensity 7350 Pro. This could result in improved image processing, dynamic range, and low-light performance. The Nokia G60’s camera system, while functional, is likely to be more basic, focusing on providing acceptable results in good lighting conditions. The absence of OIS information for either device makes it difficult to assess video stabilization capabilities.
Performance
The core of the performance disparity lies in the chipsets. The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 7350 Pro, fabricated on a 4nm process, featuring a more modern CPU architecture (2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) than the Nokia G60’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). This translates to a substantial performance uplift in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. The Snapdragon 695’s (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) is adequate for everyday use, but will show its limitations when multitasking or running demanding applications. The 4nm process of the Dimensity 7350 Pro also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus shines in the battery and charging department. While specific mAh capacity isn't provided, its active use score of 16:34h demonstrates excellent battery life. Crucially, it supports 50W wired charging, achieving 50% charge in just 21 minutes and a full charge in 56 minutes. The Nokia G60, with its 20W wired charging and PD3.0 support, is significantly slower, making it less convenient for users who need a quick top-up. The difference in charging speed is a major advantage for the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus.
Buying Guide
Buy the Nokia G60 if you prioritize a lower upfront cost and a simple, stock-Android experience, and aren't heavily reliant on demanding applications or fast charging. Buy the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus if you value a brighter, more vibrant display, significantly faster performance for gaming and multitasking, and the convenience of rapid 50W charging, even if it means a higher investment.