Nokia G60 vs Nokia X30: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Nokia X30 edges out the G60 thanks to its significantly brighter display, faster charging, and potentially improved camera capabilities. While both offer solid 5G performance, the X30 provides a more premium experience, justifying its likely higher price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Nokia G60 | Nokia X30 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - LATAM | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 01 | 2022, September 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 01 | Available. Released 2022, September 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 166 x 75.9 x 8.6 mm (6.54 x 2.99 x 0.34 in) | 158.9 x 73.9 x 8 mm (6.26 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Splash resistant | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~82.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 400 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 450 nits (typ), 700 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 - 128GB UFS 3.0 - 256GB | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06" |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.5", 0.7µm, PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/5.0" Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 20W wired, PD3.0 | 33W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pure Black, Ice Gray | Cloudy Blue, Ice White |
| Models | TA-1490, TA-1481, TA-1479, TA-1475 | TA-1450, TA-1443 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | $ 399.00 |
| SAR | 1.30 W/kg (head) 0.83 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 1.10 W/kg (head) 1.27 W/kg (body) | 0.79 W/kg (head) 1.37 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 94h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 403732 (v9) GeekBench: 1920 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Nokia G60
- More affordable
- Solid 5G performance
- Decent display
- Lower brightness display
- Slower charging
- Potentially less impressive camera
Nokia X30
- Brighter display
- Faster charging (33W)
- Potentially better camera
- Longer battery life (claimed)
- Likely more expensive
- Similar chipset to G60 (minimal performance difference)
Display Comparison
The display is a major differentiator. The Nokia X30 boasts a measured 746 nits of peak brightness, significantly higher than the G60's 444 nits. This makes the X30 much easier to view in direct sunlight. The X30 also claims an 'infinite' contrast ratio, though this is a nominal value, it suggests better image depth. The G60's 1523:1 ratio is respectable, but not in the same league.
Camera Comparison
While both are listed as 'Photo / Video', the X30 is generally expected to have slightly improved camera performance due to potentially better image processing and possibly a more advanced sensor. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) are missing, making a definitive comparison difficult, but the X30 is likely the better choice for photography enthusiasts.
Performance
Both phones utilize the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G chipset and the same CPU configuration, suggesting very similar performance in everyday tasks and gaming. Expect smooth multitasking and responsive app loading on both devices. Real-world performance differences will likely be minimal.
Battery Life
The Nokia X30 claims an impressive endurance rating of 94 hours, significantly higher than what's typically observed. The G60's battery life is respectable, but not exceptional. The X30 also benefits from 33W wired charging compared to the G60's 20W, allowing for faster top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Nokia G60 is a good choice for users prioritizing a more affordable option and don't heavily rely on outdoor visibility. The Nokia X30 is ideal for those who value a brighter screen, faster charging, and potentially a better camera experience, and are willing to spend a bit more.