Nokia G60 vs Google Pixel 6a: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Google Pixel 6a emerges as the overall winner thanks to its superior performance, exceptional camera, and brighter display. While the Nokia G60 offers a clean Android experience and decent battery life, the Pixel 6a's Google Tensor chip provides a significant edge.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Nokia G60 | Google Pixel 6a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - GX7AS, GB62Z (USA/Canada) |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GX7AS (USA/Canada) |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - LATAM | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 40, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - G1AZG (International) | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 01 | 2022, May 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 01 | Available. Released 2022, July 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 166 x 75.9 x 8.6 mm (6.54 x 2.99 x 0.34 in) | 152.2 x 71.8 x 8.9 mm (5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| Splash resistant | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~82.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 400 nits (typ) | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.5", 0.7µm, PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/5.0" Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 20W wired, PD3.0 | 18W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4410 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pure Black, Ice Gray | Chalk, Charcoal, Sage |
| Models | TA-1490, TA-1481, TA-1479, TA-1475 | GX7AS, GB62Z, G1AZG, GB17L |
| Price | About 240 EUR | $ 138.99 / C$ 228.74 / ₹ 23,999 |
| SAR | 1.30 W/kg (head) 0.83 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 1.10 W/kg (head) 1.27 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 94h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Nokia G60
- Clean Android experience
- Guaranteed software updates
- Affordable price
- Decent battery life
- Less powerful processor
- Dimmer display
- Mediocre camera performance
- Slow charging
Google Pixel 6a
- Excellent camera
- Powerful Google Tensor chip
- Bright and vibrant display
- Smooth performance
- Clean Android experience
- Slower charging speed
- Price slightly higher than G60
- Tensor chip can get warm under heavy load
Display Comparison
The Pixel 6a boasts a significantly brighter display at 876 nits compared to the Nokia G60's 444 nits. While the G60's 1523:1 contrast ratio is respectable, the Pixel 6a's 'infinite' contrast (nominal) suggests excellent black levels. The Pixel 6a's display is noticeably more vibrant and easier to view in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6a's camera is a standout feature. Google's computational photography expertise delivers exceptional image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The Nokia G60's camera is competent but doesn't match the Pixel 6a's dynamic range, detail, and overall image processing.
Performance
Here, the Pixel 6a truly shines. The Google Tensor chip is considerably more powerful than the Snapdragon 695 5G found in the Nokia G60. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive overall experience on the Pixel 6a. Gaming performance will also be noticeably better.
Battery Life
Both phones offer solid battery life, with the Nokia G60 achieving an endurance rating of 94h. The Pixel 6a also boasts a 94h endurance rating. While both are good, neither offers exceptionally fast charging (20W/18W respectively). Expect a full day of use from either device.
Buying Guide
The Nokia G60 is ideal for users who prioritize a clean, stock Android experience, long-term software updates, and a more affordable price point. The Google Pixel 6a is perfect for those who want a top-tier camera, smooth performance, and access to Google's latest features, even on a mid-range budget.