The budget 5G smartphone market is heating up, and the Nokia G400 and Samsung Galaxy A14 5G are two contenders vying for your attention. Both offer 5G connectivity at an affordable price, but which one delivers the best overall experience? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G edges out the Nokia G400 thanks to its superior chipset, brighter display, and longer software support. While the Nokia G400 offers a slightly faster charging speed, the A14's overall package provides better value and performance for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 25, 26, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 2, 5, 25, 41, 66, 71, 77 SA/NSA | 2, 5, 66, 77 Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 05 | 2023, January 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 24 | Available. Released 2023, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 166.4 x 76.7 x 8.8 mm (6.55 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) | 167.7 x 78 x 9.1 mm (6.60 x 3.07 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~81.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~80.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | PLS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.9 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - SM-A146BOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - SM-A146P |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) - SM-A146BMediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) - SM-A146P |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MP2 - SM-A146BMali-G57 MC2 - SM-A146P |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, One UI Core 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - USA onlymicroSDXC (dedicated slot) - International |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio (Exynos 1330 chipset only), recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 20W wired, PD3.0 | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Meteor Grey | Black, Light Green, Dark Red, Silver |
| Models | TA-1530, TA-1448, TA-1476, N1530DL | SM-A146B, SM-A146B/DS, SM-A146P, SM-A146P/DS, SM-A146U, SM-A146U1, SM-A146U1/DS, SM-A146W, SM-A146P/N, SM-A146P/DSN, SM-S146VL, SM-A146M |
| Price | About 70 EUR | $ 77.63 / C$ 151.00 / £ 97.00 / € 159.79 / ₹ 14,990 |
| SAR | 1.05 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.56 W/kg (head) 1.28 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 130h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1334:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 307886 (v9)
GeekBench: 1727 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Nokia G400
- Clean Android experience
- Slightly faster charging (20W)
- Decent 5G connectivity
- Weaker processor
- Lower brightness display
- Less impressive camera
- Potentially shorter software support
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
- More powerful processor (Exynos 1330 or Dimensity 700)
- Brighter display
- Excellent battery life
- Samsung's software support
- Slower charging (15W)
- Plastic build quality
- Can be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G boasts a brighter display (519 nits vs. estimated 400-450 nits for the G400) and potentially better color accuracy. Both offer a similar contrast ratio (1334:1), but the A14's higher brightness makes it more usable outdoors. Both likely feature similar LCD panels with FHD+ resolution.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be better on the Galaxy A14 5G. Samsung generally offers more refined camera software and image processing. While both phones feature multiple rear cameras, the A14's main sensor and image processing are expected to produce superior results, especially in low light. The G400's camera is serviceable but not exceptional.
Performance
Here, the Galaxy A14 5G takes a significant lead. The Exynos 1330 (or Dimensity 700 depending on region) is considerably more powerful than the Snapdragon 480+. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the A14 5G. The G400's Snapdragon 480+ is adequate for basic tasks but will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A14 5G shines with its exceptional endurance rating of 130 hours. The Nokia G400's battery life is respectable, but likely falls short of the A14's longevity. While the G400 charges slightly faster (20W vs 15W), the A14's larger battery capacity and efficient chipset provide a clear advantage in overall battery life.
Buying Guide
The Nokia G400 is a good choice for users prioritizing a slightly faster charging speed and a clean Android experience. The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G is ideal for those seeking a more powerful processor, a brighter display, and the reassurance of Samsung's software updates.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better performance?
The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G has a significantly more powerful processor, resulting in better overall performance and smoother multitasking.
❓ How long does the battery last on each phone?
The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G offers exceptional battery life with an endurance rating of 130 hours, surpassing the Nokia G400.