Nokia's budget 5G offerings, the G400 and X100, provide accessible entry points into the world of faster connectivity. But which one delivers the better overall experience? This comprehensive comparison dives deep into their specs, performance, and features to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Nokia G400 edges out the X100 thanks to its slightly faster processor and quicker charging. While both offer 5G connectivity at an affordable price, the G400's minor performance advantage and PD3.0 charging make it the slightly better choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 25, 26, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 20, 25, 26, 38, 39, 40, 41, 71 |
| 5G bands | 2, 5, 25, 41, 66, 71, 77 SA/NSA | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 05 | 2021, November 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 24 | Available. Released 2021, November 19 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 166.4 x 76.7 x 8.8 mm (6.55 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) | 171.4 x 79.7 x 9.1 mm (6.75 x 3.14 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 217 g (7.65 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~81.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~78.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.9 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | Yes |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 20W wired, PD3.0 | 18W wired, QC3 |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4470 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Meteor Grey | Midnight Blue |
| Models | TA-1530, TA-1448, TA-1476, N1530DL | - |
| Price | About 70 EUR | About 220 EUR |
| SAR | 1.05 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) | - |
Nokia G400
- Slightly faster processor (Snapdragon 480+)
- Potentially less versatile camera system
- Slightly slower charging than some competitors
Nokia X100
- Potentially better camera versatility
- Mature design
- Slightly slower processor (Snapdragon 480)
- Slower charging (QC3)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.67-inch display, likely IPS LCD panels with a FHD+ resolution. While both offer decent viewing experiences, the G400 might have slightly better color accuracy due to potential software optimizations. Expect similar brightness levels and viewing angles on both.
Camera Comparison
The Nokia X100 generally has a more versatile camera system, often including a higher resolution main sensor (typically 48MP vs. G400's 48MP) and potentially a dedicated macro lens. The G400 might compensate with software processing, but the X100 often delivers slightly better image quality, especially in low light. Both offer decent video recording capabilities.
Performance
The G400 boasts a Snapdragon 480+ processor, a slightly overclocked version of the X100's Snapdragon 480. This translates to marginally better performance in everyday tasks and gaming. Both phones will handle basic apps and multitasking well, but the G400 will feel a bit snappier.
Battery Life
The Nokia X100 typically has a slightly larger battery capacity (around 4470 mAh vs G400's 5000 mAh, though this can vary slightly by region). However, the G400's 20W PD3.0 charging offers faster charging speeds compared to the X100's 18W QC3 charging. Real-world battery life will likely be similar, with both lasting a full day for moderate users.
Buying Guide
The Nokia G400 is ideal for users prioritizing a bit more processing power and faster charging speeds within a tight budget. The Nokia X100 is a solid option for those seeking a reliable 5G phone with a slightly larger battery and a more mature design, willing to trade a bit of performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ What is the difference between the Snapdragon 480 and 480+?
The Snapdragon 480+ is a slightly overclocked version of the Snapdragon 480, offering a small performance boost, typically around 10-15%.
❓ Are these phones good for gaming?
Both phones are adequate for casual gaming, but don't expect high frame rates or demanding graphics settings. They're best suited for less intensive mobile games.
