The Nokia G300 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive sub-$200 5G smartphone market. Both aim to deliver 5G connectivity without breaking the bank, but they achieve this with different chipsets and design philosophies. This comparison dissects their key specifications to determine which device offers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R emerges as the stronger choice. Its MediaTek Dimensity 700, fabricated on a smaller 7nm process, provides a noticeable performance edge over the Nokia G300’s Snapdragon 480. While both offer 18W charging, the Redmi Note 11R’s more efficient chipset translates to better sustained performance and potentially longer battery life.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 2, 5, 25, 41, 66, 71, 77 SA/NSA | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA 800 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 12 | 2022, September 30 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 19 | Available. Released 2022, September 30 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 169.4 x 78.4 x 9.3 mm (6.67 x 3.09 x 0.37 in) | 164 x 76.1 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210.1 g (7.41 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~77.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4470 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Meteor Grey | Black, Blue, Gray |
| Models | TA-1374, N1374DL | 22095RA98C |
| Price | About 100 EUR | About 160 EUR |
| SAR | 1.44 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) | - |
Nokia G300
- Clean Android experience (likely)
- Potential for longer software support from Nokia
- 5G connectivity at an affordable price
- Less powerful Snapdragon 480 chipset
- 8nm process less efficient than 7nm
- Potentially slower app loading and multitasking
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R
- More powerful MediaTek Dimensity 700 chipset
- 7nm process for improved efficiency and thermals
- Better performance for gaming and multitasking
- MIUI software may include bloatware
- Software update policy may be less consistent than Nokia
- Potential for more aggressive battery optimization
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, a common cost-saving measure in this price bracket. The key difference lies under the hood: display driver efficiency. While specific display specs (resolution, brightness) are missing, the Redmi Note 11R’s more efficient Dimensity 700 could allow for slightly better display performance without significantly impacting battery life. Bezels are expected to be comparable, reflecting the budget nature of both phones.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, it’s reasonable to assume both phones feature a primary camera and supporting lenses (likely depth or macro). The Redmi Note 11R’s more powerful chipset could offer better image processing capabilities, potentially leading to improved image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The aperture and sensor size of the main camera will be critical, but without that data, we can only speculate that the Redmi Note 11R has a slight edge due to its superior processing power.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R’s MediaTek Dimensity 700, built on a 7nm process, holds a clear advantage over the Nokia G300’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 (8nm). A smaller process node generally translates to improved power efficiency and thermal performance. The Dimensity 700’s CPU configuration – 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores – also offers a performance boost compared to the Snapdragon 480’s 2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460. This means faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience on the Redmi Note 11R. While both likely feature similar RAM configurations, the chipset difference will be the dominant factor.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 18W wired charging, suggesting similar charging speeds (around 2-3 hours for a full charge). However, the Dimensity 700’s 7nm process is more power-efficient than the Snapdragon 480’s 8nm process. This means the Redmi Note 11R is likely to deliver longer battery life on a single charge, even with a similar battery capacity (which is currently unknown for both devices). The chipset’s efficiency will also result in less heat generation during prolonged use, further contributing to sustained performance and battery longevity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Nokia G300 if you prioritize a clean Android experience and a brand known for software update consistency, even if it means sacrificing some raw processing power. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R if you prioritize performance for gaming and multitasking, and are comfortable with Xiaomi’s MIUI software, which offers extensive customization options but may include pre-installed bloatware.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Redmi Note 11R’s Dimensity 700 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The MediaTek Dimensity 700 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium to high settings with reasonable frame rates. While it won't deliver a flagship gaming experience, it provides a significantly better gaming performance than the Snapdragon 480 in the Nokia G300, offering a more enjoyable experience for casual gamers.
❓ How does Xiaomi’s MIUI software affect the Redmi Note 11R’s performance and battery life?
MIUI is a heavily customized Android skin. While it offers extensive customization options, it can also be resource-intensive, potentially impacting performance and battery life. Xiaomi’s aggressive battery optimization features can sometimes kill background apps, which may be undesirable for some users. However, MIUI also includes features to manage app power consumption.
❓ Is the 18W charging on either phone considered fast charging in 2024?
18W charging is relatively slow by 2024 standards. Expect a full charge to take around 2-3 hours. While not a dealbreaker, it's a significant drawback compared to phones offering 33W or 67W charging. The Redmi Note 11R’s more efficient chipset may mitigate the slower charging speed somewhat by reducing the overall time spent plugged in.
