The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for your money. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the Nokia G22, known for its repairability, and the Samsung Galaxy A14 5G, a popular choice for its features and brand recognition. Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to see which phone reigns supreme.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G takes the crown thanks to its superior chipset (Exynos 1330 or Dimensity 700), brighter display, and faster charging. While the Nokia G22 boasts repairability, the A14 5G offers a more well-rounded experience for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 66, 77 Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 25 | 2023, January 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 25 | Available. Released 2023, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165 x 76.2 x 8.5 mm (6.50 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 167.7 x 78 x 9.1 mm (6.60 x 3.07 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196.2 g (6.91 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | Dust and splash resistant
QuickFix user-reparable design | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~80.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 500 nits (typ) | PLS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - SM-A146BOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - SM-A146P |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) - SM-A146BMediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) - SM-A146P |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G68 MP2 - SM-A146BMali-G57 MC2 - SM-A146P |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, One UI Core 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - USA onlymicroSDXC (dedicated slot) - International |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio, RDS | FM radio (Exynos 1330 chipset only), recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 20W wired, PD3.0 | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5050 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Lagoon Blue, Meteor Gray, So Peach | Black, Light Green, Dark Red, Silver |
| Models | - | SM-A146B, SM-A146B/DS, SM-A146P, SM-A146P/DS, SM-A146U, SM-A146U1, SM-A146U1/DS, SM-A146W, SM-A146P/N, SM-A146P/DSN, SM-S146VL, SM-A146M |
| Price | About 120 EUR | $ 77.63 / C$ 151.00 / £ 97.00 / € 159.79 / ₹ 14,990 |
| SAR | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.56 W/kg (head) 1.28 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 130h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1334:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 307886 (v9)
GeekBench: 1727 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Nokia G22
- Repairable design
- Clean Android experience
- Decent battery life
- Affordable price
- Underpowered chipset
- Lower display brightness
- Slower charging
- Less impressive camera
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
- Faster performance (Exynos/Dimensity)
- Brighter display
- 5G connectivity
- Better camera system
- Faster charging (15W)
- Samsung's One UI can be bloated
- 15W charging is still relatively slow
- Plastic build quality
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G edges out the Nokia G22 with a measured peak brightness of 519 nits, offering better visibility in sunlight. Both phones feature a 1334:1 contrast ratio, suggesting good black levels, but the A14 5G's higher brightness provides a more vibrant and enjoyable viewing experience. Screen sizes are likely similar, around 6.5 inches, but panel technology (likely LCD for both) will influence color accuracy.
Camera Comparison
While both phones are budget devices, the Galaxy A14 5G likely offers a more versatile camera system. Samsung typically provides better image processing and features. The G22's camera is expected to be decent but won't match the A14 5G's capabilities in low light or with advanced features. Specific megapixel counts and lens configurations are needed for a more precise comparison.
Performance
Here's where the Galaxy A14 5G truly shines. The Exynos 1330 (or Dimensity 700) is significantly more powerful than the Unisoc T606. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the A14 5G. The G22's chipset is adequate for basic tasks but will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones boast impressive battery life, with the Galaxy A14 5G claiming an endurance rating of 130 hours. The Nokia G22's battery capacity is likely around 5000mAh, suggesting comparable longevity. However, the A14 5G's more efficient chipset could give it a slight edge in real-world usage.
Buying Guide
The Nokia G22 is ideal for users prioritizing repairability and longevity, wanting a phone they can easily fix themselves. The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G is a better choice for those seeking a smoother performance, a brighter display, and 5G connectivity, especially if you value the Samsung ecosystem.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Nokia G22 easy to repair?
Yes, the Nokia G22 is designed with repairability in mind, using readily available parts and a modular design.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A14 5G support 5G?
Yes, as the name suggests, the Galaxy A14 5G supports 5G connectivity, offering faster data speeds where available.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
Samsung generally offers longer software update support than Nokia, although Nokia has improved in recent years. Expect more timely security patches and feature updates from Samsung.
