Nokia's legacy lives on with these classic devices. The Nokia C5-03 and C5-06 offer a nostalgic experience for those seeking a simple, reliable phone. But which one is the better choice for today's user? Let's dive into a detailed comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Nokia C5-03 clearly edges out the C5-06 thanks to its significantly more powerful chipset (Exynos 9609), better display contrast, and superior battery life. While both offer a basic experience, the C5-03 provides a noticeable performance boost and longer usage time.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 1900 / 2100 | - |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 | - |
| EDGE | - | Class 32 |
| GPRS | - | Class 32 |
| Speed | HSPA 10.2/2 Mbps | - |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2010, October. Released 2010, December | 2011, October. Released 2012, March |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 105.8 x 51 x 13.8 mm, 65 cc (4.17 x 2.01 x 0.54 in) | 105.8 x 51 x 13.8 mm, 65 cc (4.17 x 2.01 x 0.54 in) |
| SIM | Mini-SIM | Mini-SIM |
| Weight | 93 g (3.28 oz) | 93 g (3.28 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 360 x 640 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~229 ppi density) | 360 x 640 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~229 ppi density) |
| Size | 3.2 inches, 28.2 cm2 (~52.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 3.2 inches, 28.2 cm2 (~52.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT resistive touchscreen, 16M colors | TFT resistive touchscreen, 16M colors |
| | Handwriting recognition | Handwriting recognition |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | 600 MHz ARM 11 | 600 MHz |
| Chipset | Exynos 9609 (10 nm) | - |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | - |
| OS | Symbian 9.4, Series 60 rel. 5 | Symbian 9.4, Series 60 rel. 5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot), 2 GB included | microSDHC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 40MB 128MB RAM | 40MB 128MB RAM 256MB ROM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 5 MP | 2 MP |
| Triple | 12 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 1.25µm, PDAF
16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm (ultrawide), dedicated video camera (1080p)
5 MP, f/2.2, (depth) | - |
| Video | 480p@15fps | 480p@15fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 1.25µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | - |
| | No | No |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 2.0, A2DP | 2.1, A2DP, EDR |
| NFC | Yes | - |
| Positioning | GPS, A-GPS; Nokia Maps | GPS, A-GPS; Nokia Maps |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio | Stereo FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g, UPnP technology | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | WAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML, Adobe Flash Lite | - |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| | MP4/H.264/WMV player
MP3/WAV/еAAC+/WMA player
Photo editor
Organizer
Voice command/dial
Predictive text input | MP4/H.264/WMV player
MP3/WAV/еAAC+/WMA player
Photo editor
Organizer
QuickOffice document viewer
Voice command/dial
Predictive text input |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Music play | Up to 35 h | Up to 35 h |
| Stand-by | Up to 600 h (2G) / Up to 576 h (3G) | Up to 600 h |
| Talk time | Up to 11 h 30 min (2G) / Up to 4 h 30 min (3G) | Up to 11 h 30 min |
| Type | Removable Li-Ion 1000 mAh battery | Removable Li-Ion 1000 mAh battery (Bl-4U) |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Graphite Black, Lime Green, Petrol Blue, Aluminum Grey, Pink/black | Graphite Black, Aluminium Grey, Red, Orange, Blue, Black Illuvial, White Illuvial, White/Red, White/Orange |
| Models | XT2013-1, XT2013-2, XT2013-4 | - |
| Price | About 100 EUR | About 90 EUR |
| SAR | 1.36 W/kg (head) 0.89 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 1.29 W/kg (head) | 0.90 W/kg (head) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality |
Noise -90.0dB / Crosstalk -92.0dB | - |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 66h | - |
| Camera |
Photo | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1237:1 (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
Voice 73dB / Noise 65dB / Ring 75dB
| - |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 148748 (v7)
GeekBench: 5271 (v4.4) | - |
| OUR TESTS |
|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -90.0dB / Crosstalk -92.0dB | - |
| Camera | Photo | - |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 73dB / Noise 65dB / Ring 75dB | - |
Nokia C5-03
- Superior Performance (Exynos 9609)
- Excellent Battery Life (66h Endurance)
- Better Display Contrast (1237:1)
- More Modern Chipset
- Basic Camera Quality
- Outdated Design
- Limited App Support
Nokia C5-06
- Potentially Lower Price
- Simple and Easy to Use
- Classic Nokia Design
- Poor Performance (Single-Core 600 MHz)
- Unknown Battery Life (Likely Shorter)
- Basic Display
- Limited Functionality
Display Comparison
The Nokia C5-03 boasts a significantly better display with a contrast ratio of 1237:1, offering richer colors and deeper blacks compared to the C5-06's likely standard display (specs are missing, assuming a lower contrast ratio). Both feature similar screen sizes and resolutions, but the C5-03's contrast makes a noticeable difference.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature a basic photo camera. However, the C5-03's chipset likely allows for slightly better image processing, although don't expect high-quality photos from either device. Both are primarily for basic snapshots.
Performance
This is where the C5-03 shines. Its Exynos 9609 chipset (10nm) provides a substantial performance advantage over the C5-06's single-core 600 MHz processor. Expect smoother multitasking and faster app loading on the C5-03. The C5-06 will feel noticeably slower.
Battery Life
The C5-03's endurance rating of 66h is a major win. The C5-06's battery life is unknown, but likely significantly shorter given its less efficient processor. The C5-03 offers significantly longer usage time between charges.
Buying Guide
The Nokia C5-03 is ideal for users prioritizing performance and battery life within a budget-friendly, retro package. The Nokia C5-06 might appeal to those seeking the absolute bare minimum in a Nokia phone, valuing simplicity above all else, and potentially finding it at a lower price point.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Are these phones suitable for modern apps?
No, both phones run older operating systems and have limited processing power. Modern apps are unlikely to function correctly or at all.
❓ What operating system do these phones use?
Both phones run Symbian OS, an outdated mobile operating system.
❓ Are accessories readily available for these phones?
Finding new accessories might be challenging, but used accessories are likely available online.