Nokia's budget smartphone lineup offers reliable options, but choosing between models can be tricky. We're pitting the Nokia C32 against the Nokia G21 to see which delivers the best value for your money. This comparison dives deep into their specs, performance, and features.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Nokia G21 emerges as the clear winner thanks to its significantly faster chipset, faster charging, and exceptional battery life. While the C32 boasts a slightly more modern design, the G21's overall performance and features justify its slight price premium.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 40, 66 - LATAM |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 25 | 2022, February 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 25 | Available. Released 2022, February 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 75.9 x 8.6 mm (6.48 x 2.99 x 0.34 in) | 164.6 x 75.9 x 8.5 mm (6.48 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199.4 g (7.02 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| | Splash and dust resistant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Scratch-resistant glass | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A1 (22 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) |
| GPU | IMG8322 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, (wide), AF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio | FM radio, RDS |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5050 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Charcoal, Autumn Green, Beach Pink | Nordic Blue, Dusk |
| Models | - | TA-1418, TA-1477, TA-1415, TA-1405, TA-1404, TA-1412 |
| Price | $ 129.00 / £ 73.99 / € 104.99 | About 90 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.10 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.34 W/kg (head) 1.05 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 126h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1631:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-30.7 LUFS (Below average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 171299 (v9)
GeekBench: 1193 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 8.9fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Nokia C32
- Modern design
- Durable build
- Clean Android experience
- Slower performance
- Slower charging
- Lower brightness display
- Less powerful chipset
Nokia G21
- Excellent battery life
- Faster charging (18W, PD3.0)
- Better performance
- Brighter display
- Design slightly less modern than C32
- Camera details unclear
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.5-inch HD+ display with a 1631:1 contrast ratio. The G21, however, boasts a measured 500 nits of brightness, offering better visibility in sunlight compared to the C32's likely lower brightness. While both offer similar resolution, the G21's brightness advantage makes it the winner here.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited in the provided specs, but both phones offer Photo/Video capabilities. Given the G21's generally better hardware, it's likely to offer slightly improved image quality and processing. Further testing would be needed for a definitive conclusion.
Performance
The Nokia G21's Unisoc T606 chipset (12nm) with dual Cortex-A75 cores provides a noticeable performance boost over the C32's Unisoc SC9863A1 (22nm) with only Cortex-A55 cores. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive user experience on the G21. The G21's architecture is simply more efficient.
Battery Life
The Nokia G21's battery life is a standout feature, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 126 hours. This significantly surpasses what the C32 is likely to achieve. Coupled with 18W charging and PD3.0 support, the G21 offers a superior charging and longevity experience.
Buying Guide
The Nokia C32 is ideal for users prioritizing a clean design and basic functionality. It's a good choice for first-time smartphone users or those needing a simple device for calls, texts, and light browsing. The Nokia G21 is better suited for users who want a smoother experience, longer battery life, and faster charging, even on a budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which Nokia phone has better battery life?
The Nokia G21 has significantly better battery life, with an endurance rating of 126 hours, compared to the C32.
❓ Is the Nokia C32 worth buying if I only need a basic phone?
The Nokia C32 is a decent option for basic use, but the Nokia G21 offers a better overall experience for a small price difference.