Looking for an affordable Nokia smartphone? The C32 and 5.4 are both solid contenders, but cater to slightly different needs. This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which one best fits your budget and priorities.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Nokia 5.4 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 662 chipset offers significantly better performance and efficiency than the C32's Unisoc processor. While the C32 boasts a larger battery, the 5.4's overall package is more compelling for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 28, 66 - NA, LATAM |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 25 | 2020, December 15. Released 2020, December 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 25 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 75.9 x 8.6 mm (6.48 x 2.99 x 0.34 in) | 161 x 76 x 8.7 mm (6.34 x 2.99 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199.4 g (7.02 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | Splash and dust resistant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Scratch-resistant glass | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.39 inches, 100.2 cm2 (~81.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A1 (22 nm) | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) |
| GPU | IMG8322 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, (wide), AF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, 13mm (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP | 4.2, A2DP, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Charcoal, Autumn Green, Beach Pink | Polar Night, Dusk |
| Models | - | TA-1333, TA-1340, TA-1337, TA-1328, TA-1325 |
| Price | $ 129.00 / £ 73.99 / € 104.99 | About 90 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.02 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
Nokia C32
- Large 5000mAh battery
- Durable design
- Affordable price
- Slow performance
- Basic camera
- Outdated chipset
Nokia 5.4
- Better performance (Snapdragon 662)
- Improved camera quality
- More modern software
- Smaller battery than C32
- 10W charging is slow
- Display could be brighter
Display Comparison
The Nokia 5.4 features a 6.39-inch IPS LCD display with a 720 x 1560 resolution, offering a decent viewing experience. The C32 has a 6.5-inch IPS LCD with a similar resolution. While both are adequate, the 5.4's slightly larger size and potentially better color accuracy give it a slight edge. Both phones lack high refresh rates.
Camera Comparison
The Nokia 5.4 has a quad-camera setup (48MP main, 5MP ultrawide, 2MP depth, 2MP macro) and a 16MP front camera. The C32 features a triple-camera setup (50MP main, 2MP depth, 2MP macro) and an 8MP front camera. The 5.4's better image processing and more versatile camera system result in superior photo quality, particularly in low light.
Performance
This is where the Nokia 5.4 shines. The Snapdragon 662 is a much more powerful and efficient chipset than the Unisoc SC9863A1. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the 5.4. The C32 will feel noticeably slower, especially with demanding apps.
Battery Life
The Nokia C32 packs a larger 5000mAh battery compared to the 5.4's 4000mAh battery. However, the 5.4's more efficient chipset means it can often achieve similar or even better battery life in real-world usage. Both phones support 10W charging, which is relatively slow.
Buying Guide
The Nokia C32 is ideal for users prioritizing a large battery and a durable design on a very tight budget. The Nokia 5.4 is a better choice for those who want smoother performance, a better camera, and a more modern software experience, even if it means a slightly smaller battery.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Nokia C32 good for gaming?
The Nokia C32's chipset is not ideal for demanding games. You'll likely experience lag and low frame rates. The Nokia 5.4 offers a significantly better gaming experience.
❓ Which Nokia phone has better software support?
Nokia generally provides good software updates. However, the Nokia 5.4, being a slightly newer model, is likely to receive updates for a longer period.