Nokia's budget phone lineup offers reliable options, but choosing between them can be tricky. We're pitting the Nokia C30 and the Nokia G21 against each other to see which delivers the best value for your money. Let's dive into a detailed comparison!
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Nokia G21 emerges as the clear winner. While the C30 is a decent entry-level device, the G21's superior chipset, faster charging, and brighter display provide a significantly better overall experience, justifying its slightly higher price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 7, 20, 28 - Australia, UK, Ireland | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 40, 66 - LATAM |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 27 | 2022, February 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 12 | Available. Released 2022, February 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 177.7 x 79.1 x 9.9 mm (7.00 x 3.11 x 0.39 in) | 164.6 x 75.9 x 8.5 mm (6.48 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 237 g (8.36 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~257 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 112.3 cm2 (~79.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) |
| GPU | IMG8322 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition) | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, (wide)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | Unspecified | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5050 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Green, White, Dark Grey | Nordic Blue, Dusk |
| Models | TA-1357, TA-1377, TA-1369, TA-1360, TA-1359 | TA-1418, TA-1477, TA-1415, TA-1405, TA-1404, TA-1412 |
| Price | About 100 EUR | About 90 EUR |
| SAR | 0.33 W/kg (head) 1.19 W/kg (body) | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.10 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.41 W/kg (head) 1.29 W/kg (body) | 0.34 W/kg (head) 1.05 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 126h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1631:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-30.7 LUFS (Below average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 171299 (v9)
GeekBench: 1193 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 8.9fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| OUR TESTS |
|---|
| Battery (old) | - | Endurance rating 126h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | 1631:1 contrast ratio, 500 nits max brightness (measured) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -30.7 LUFS (Below average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 171299 (v9)
GeekBench: 1193 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 8.9fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Nokia C30
- Affordable
- Durable build
- Decent battery life
- Android Go Edition
- Slow performance
- Limited storage
- Slow charging
- Dim display
Nokia G21
- Better performance
- Brighter display
- Faster charging (18W)
- Long battery life
- More modern design
- Slightly more expensive
- Still a budget phone (compromises exist)
Display Comparison
The Nokia G21 boasts a brighter display (500 nits measured) compared to the C30, offering better visibility outdoors. Both have a high contrast ratio (1631:1), but the G21's brightness advantage makes a noticeable difference in everyday use. The G21's display also generally offers better color accuracy.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the G21 generally produces better image quality thanks to its more capable chipset and potentially better image processing algorithms. Expect more detail and better low-light performance from the G21. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) are not provided, but the G21's hardware is likely superior.
Performance
The Nokia G21's Unisoc T606 chipset (12nm) is a significant upgrade over the C30's Unisoc SC9863A (28nm). The G21's CPU architecture, featuring Cortex-A75 cores, provides a noticeable performance boost for multitasking and demanding apps. The C30 feels sluggish in comparison.
Battery Life
Both phones advertise impressive battery life, with the G21 achieving an endurance rating of 126 hours. The C30's battery life is also good, but the G21's more efficient chipset contributes to its edge in this category. The G21 also supports 18W fast charging (PD3.0) compared to the C30's 10W wired charging, significantly reducing charging times.
Buying Guide
The Nokia C30 is ideal for users needing a basic smartphone for calls, texts, and light app usage. It's a great first phone or a backup device. The Nokia G21 is better suited for users who want a smoother experience, longer battery life, and a better camera, even on a budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Nokia C30 good for gaming?
The Nokia C30's chipset is not ideal for demanding games. It can handle basic games, but expect low frame rates and potential lag.
❓ What Android version do these phones run?
Both phones launched with Android 11 (Go Edition). Nokia promises software updates, but the frequency and duration of support may vary.