Looking for an affordable smartphone that doesn't completely break the bank? The Nokia C22 and Samsung Galaxy M04 are both contenders in the budget phone arena. But which one offers the best bang for your buck? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy M04 edges out the Nokia C22 thanks to its more powerful processor, faster charging, and generally smoother performance. While the C22 boasts a durable design and potentially longer software support, the M04 provides a more enjoyable user experience overall.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 25 | 2022, December 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 25 | Available. Released 2022, December 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 75.9 x 8.6 mm (6.48 x 2.99 x 0.34 in) | 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| | Splash and dust resistant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Scratch-resistant glass | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | IMG8322 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 13 (Go edition) | Android 12, One UI Core 4.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, (wide), AF
2 MP (macro) | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sand, Midnight Black | Sea Glass Green, Shadow Blue |
| Models | - | SM-M045F, SM-M045F/DS |
| Price | About 90 EUR | About 100 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.38 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.29 W/kg (head) 1.11 W/kg (body) |
Nokia C22
- Durable build quality
- Potentially longer software support (Nokia's reputation)
- Clean Android experience
- Slower performance
- Slower charging
- Less vibrant display
- Older chipset
Samsung Galaxy M04
- Faster performance
- Faster charging
- Potentially better camera quality
- More responsive user interface
- Potentially shorter software support than Nokia
- Samsung's One UI can be divisive
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.5-inch HD+ display, offering decent viewing angles for everyday use. However, the Samsung Galaxy M04's display might exhibit slightly better color accuracy and brightness due to Samsung's generally superior display technology. Resolution is likely similar, around 720 x 1600 pixels.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are likely comparable, with both phones featuring a dual-camera setup on the rear, potentially including a 13MP main sensor and a 2MP depth sensor. However, Samsung's image processing algorithms are generally considered superior, potentially resulting in slightly better photos, especially in low-light conditions. The M04 likely has a better front-facing camera as well.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy M04's Mediatek Helio P35 chipset (12nm) significantly outperforms the Nokia C22's Unisoc SC9863A (28nm). The P35's higher clock speeds and more efficient architecture result in noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user interface. Gaming performance will also be better on the M04.
Battery Life
Both phones likely feature a 5000mAh battery, offering all-day battery life for moderate usage. However, the Samsung Galaxy M04's 15W fast charging provides a significant advantage over the Nokia C22's 10W charging, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Nokia C22 is ideal for users prioritizing durability and potentially longer software updates, and who are on a very tight budget. The Samsung Galaxy M04 is a better choice for those seeking a smoother, more responsive experience and faster charging, even if it means a slightly higher price.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
Both phones likely offer all-day battery life with a 5000mAh battery. However, the Samsung Galaxy M04 charges significantly faster.
❓ Is the Nokia C22 worth buying if I prioritize software updates?
Nokia has a reputation for providing longer software support, so the C22 might be a better choice if that's your top priority, but Samsung has improved in this area.
