Looking for an affordable smartphone that doesn't completely break the bank? The Nokia C22 and Oppo A17k are both contenders in the budget segment, offering essential features at attractive price points. But which one delivers the better overall experience?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo A17k edges out the Nokia C22 thanks to its more powerful chipset and slightly better performance. While the Nokia C22 boasts a durable design and potentially longer software support, the A17k provides a smoother user experience for everyday tasks.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 25 | 2022, October 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 25 | Available. Released 2022, October 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 75.9 x 8.6 mm (6.48 x 2.99 x 0.34 in) | 164.2 x 75.6 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | Splash and dust resistant | IPX4 water resistance |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Scratch-resistant glass | Panda Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio G35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | IMG8322 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 13 (Go edition) | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, (wide), AF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sand, Midnight Black | Navy Blue, Gold |
| Models | - | CPH2471 |
| Price | About 90 EUR | About 130 EUR |
Nokia C22
- Durable build quality
- Clean Android experience
- Potential for longer software support
- Repairable design
- Slower performance
- Less vibrant display
- Basic camera
- 10W charging is slow
Oppo A17k
- Better performance
- Slightly better camera
- More efficient battery usage
- Stylish design
- Less durable build
- Software updates may be less frequent
- 10W charging is slow
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.5-inch HD+ display, offering decent viewing angles and adequate brightness for indoor use. Color accuracy is typical for budget devices. The Oppo A17k might have slightly better color reproduction due to Oppo's display tuning, but the difference is minimal.
Camera Comparison
The Oppo A17k generally offers a slightly better camera experience. While both have a primary 13MP camera, the Oppo's image processing tends to produce more vibrant and detailed photos. The Nokia C22's camera is adequate for basic snapshots but struggles in low light. Both likely have a 2MP macro and depth sensor.
Performance
The Oppo A17k's MediaTek Helio G35 chipset (12nm) significantly outperforms the Nokia C22's Unisoc SC9863A (28nm). The G35's higher clock speeds and more efficient architecture result in smoother app loading, faster multitasking, and better overall responsiveness. The C22 can feel sluggish at times.
Battery Life
Both phones feature a 5000mAh battery, promising all-day battery life. However, the Oppo A17k's more efficient chipset allows it to stretch that battery life a bit further, especially with moderate usage. The Nokia C22's slower processor can drain the battery faster under load.
Buying Guide
The Nokia C22 is ideal for users prioritizing durability, a clean Android experience, and potentially longer software updates. The Oppo A17k is a better choice for those seeking a more responsive phone for basic gaming and multitasking, even if it means a slightly less premium build.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better software support?
Nokia is generally known for providing longer software support for its devices, so the Nokia C22 might receive updates for a longer period.
❓ Can I repair the Nokia C22 easily?
Yes, the Nokia C22 is designed to be easily repairable, with readily available spare parts and repair guides.
❓ Is the Oppo A17k good for gaming?
While not a gaming powerhouse, the Oppo A17k's Helio G35 chipset can handle basic games smoothly. Don't expect to play demanding titles at high settings.
