Both the Nokia C2 Tennen and C1 Plus represent Nokia’s commitment to providing affordable smartphones. However, a closer look reveals a significant performance disparity stemming from their respective processors. This comparison will dissect the key differences, helping you determine which device best suits your needs within a tight budget.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Nokia C2 Tennen is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Helio A22 chipset, clocked at 2.0 GHz, offers a noticeable performance boost over the C1 Plus’s 1.4 GHz processor, making it more responsive for daily tasks and app usage. While both are entry-level, the Tennen provides a smoother experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - International, APAC |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 - International |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | Class 12 | - |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE, Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Saudi Arabia |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 29. Released 2020, June 15 | 2020, December 15. Released 2021, January 29 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 150.6 x 72.4 x 9.1 mm (5.93 x 2.85 x 0.36 in) | 149.1 x 71.2 x 8.8 mm (5.87 x 2.80 x 0.35 in) |
| Keyboard | QWERTY | - |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 146 g (5.15 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~295 ppi density) | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~295 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.45 inches, 76.7 cm2 (~70.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.45 inches, 76.7 cm2 (~72.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Quad-core 1.4 GHz |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (16 nm) | - |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | - |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 10 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | Yes | - |
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 2GB RAM | 16GB 1GB RAM |
| Phonebook | 500 entries | - |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 8 MP, AF
2 MP | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | VGA | 5 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Games | Yes | - |
| Messaging | SMS, MMS | - |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Stand-by | Up to 240 h | - |
| Talk time | Up to 3 h | - |
| Type | Li-Po 3000 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 2500 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Steel | Blue, Red |
| Models | - | TA-1312 |
| Price | About 60 EUR | About 70 EUR |
Nokia C2 Tennen
- Faster processor (Helio A22) for smoother performance
- More responsive user experience
- 10W charging support
- Limited detailed specifications available
- Likely basic camera performance
Nokia C1 Plus
- Lower price point (likely)
- Functional for basic communication
- Potentially slightly better battery life under light use
- Significantly slower processor
- Sluggish performance for most tasks
- Limited features and specifications
Display Comparison
Neither Nokia provides detailed display specifications beyond size. However, given their price points, both likely utilize LCD panels. The absence of information regarding brightness nits or color accuracy suggests both displays are geared towards basic visibility rather than media consumption. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both devices, maximizing screen real estate within their budget constraints.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are likely to feature basic camera setups. Without specific sensor details, it’s safe to assume image quality will be limited, particularly in low-light conditions. The focus should be on functional photography for social media rather than high-quality images. Any additional cameras (often 2MP macro lenses) are unlikely to provide significant value and should be considered a marketing feature rather than a substantial improvement.
Performance
The core difference lies in the processors. The Nokia C2 Tennen’s Mediatek Helio A22 (16nm) with a quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 CPU significantly outperforms the Nokia C1 Plus’s quad-core 1.4 GHz processor. The 16nm manufacturing process of the Helio A22, while not cutting-edge, is more efficient than whatever process node the C1 Plus utilizes (likely older and less efficient). This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive overall experience on the Tennen. The higher clock speed directly impacts the speed at which the processor can execute instructions.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, given the less powerful processor in the C1 Plus, it *may* exhibit slightly better battery life under light usage. The Nokia C2 Tennen’s 10W wired charging is standard for this price range, and charging times will likely be in the 2-3 hour range for a full charge. The C1 Plus’s charging capabilities are unknown, but are likely similar or slower.
Buying Guide
Buy the Nokia C2 Tennen if you prioritize responsiveness and a slightly better user experience for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light app usage. It’s ideal for users who want a phone that doesn’t feel sluggish. Buy the Nokia C1 Plus if your primary concern is absolute cost and you only need a phone for very basic communication – calls and texts – and minimal app usage. It’s a functional device for those on the strictest of budgets.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Nokia C2 Tennen handle popular social media apps like Facebook and WhatsApp smoothly?
Yes, the Helio A22 processor in the C2 Tennen provides enough processing power to run Facebook and WhatsApp without significant lag. While it won’t offer a high-end experience, it will be usable for basic social media interaction. The C1 Plus may struggle with these apps, especially with multiple conversations open.
❓ Is the Nokia C2 Tennen a good choice for playing mobile games?
The Nokia C2 Tennen is not ideal for gaming. The Helio A22 is a basic processor and will struggle with most modern mobile games, even on low settings. Expect low frame rates and potential stuttering. The C1 Plus is even less suited for gaming due to its slower processor.
❓ What version of Android do these phones run?
Both devices likely run Android Go Edition, a lightweight version of Android designed for devices with limited processing power and RAM. This helps to optimize performance on these entry-level smartphones.
