Nokia C2 Tennen vs Motorola Moto E6 Play: A Deep Dive into Ultra-Budget Smartphones

The Nokia C2 Tennen and Motorola Moto E6 Play represent the absolute bottom end of the smartphone market, targeting users prioritizing affordability above all else. Both devices aim to provide basic smartphone functionality without breaking the bank, but significant differences in their underlying hardware dictate distinct performance characteristics. This comparison dissects those differences to determine which phone delivers the best experience for the price.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user needing a functional, if slow, smartphone for basic tasks, the Nokia C2 Tennen emerges as the slightly better choice. Its newer Mediatek Helio A22 chipset, fabricated on a smaller 16nm process, offers a performance advantage over the older, 28nm Mediatek MT6739 in the Moto E6 Play, despite the slightly lower clock speed.

PHONES
Phone Names Nokia C2 Tennen Motorola Moto E6 Play
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100
4G bandsLTE1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41
EDGENo-
GPRSClass 12-
SpeedHSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE, Cat6 300/50 MbpsHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2020, May 29. Released 2020, June 152019, October. Released 2019, November
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic back, plastic frameGlass front, plastic back, plastic frame
Dimensions150.6 x 72.4 x 9.1 mm (5.93 x 2.85 x 0.36 in)146.5 x 70.9 x 8.3 mm (5.77 x 2.79 x 0.33 in)
KeyboardQWERTY-
SIMNano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight180 g (6.35 oz)140 g (4.94 oz)
Display
Resolution720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~295 ppi density)720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~295 ppi density)
Size5.45 inches, 76.7 cm2 (~70.3% screen-to-body ratio)5.5 inches, 77.0 cm2 (~74.1% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Platform
CPUQuad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53Quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53
ChipsetMediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (16 nm)Mediatek MT6739 (28 nm)
GPUPowerVR GE8320PowerVR GE8100
OSAndroid 10Android 9.0 (Pie)
Memory
Call recordsYes-
Card slotmicroSDXCmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal16GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 2GB RAM32GB 2GB RAM
Phonebook500 entries-
 eMMC 5.1eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
Dual8 MP, AF 2 MP-
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, HDR, panorama
SingleVGA13 MP, f/2.2, 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Features-HDR
Single5 MP5 MP, f/2.2, 1/5.0", 1.12µm
Video720p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth4.2, A2DP, LE4.2, A2DP, LE
NFCNoNo
PositioningGPSGPS, GLONASS
RadioFM radioFM radio
USBUSB Type-C 2.0microUSB 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/nWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n
Features
GamesYes-
MessagingSMS, MMS-
SensorsAccelerometer, proximityFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity
Battery
Charging10W wired-
Stand-byUp to 240 h-
Talk timeUp to 3 h-
TypeLi-Po 3000 mAh, removableLi-Po 3000 mAh, non-removable
Misc
ColorsSteelTurquoise Blue, Anthracite
Models-XT2029, XT2029-1
PriceAbout 60 EURAbout 160 EUR
SAR EU-0.55 W/kg (head)     1.78 W/kg (body)

Nokia C2 Tennen

  • More efficient chipset (Mediatek Helio A22)
  • Potentially better multitasking performance
  • Likely longer battery life

  • May be slightly more expensive
  • Still limited by its entry-level hardware

Motorola Moto E6 Play

  • Potentially lower price point
  • Simple and straightforward user experience
  • Reliable brand reputation (Motorola)

  • Older, less efficient chipset (Mediatek MT6739)
  • Slower performance and potential throttling
  • Shorter battery life

Display Comparison

Neither device boasts a standout display. Both are expected to feature low-resolution panels, likely 720p+, given their price bracket. However, display details are not provided in the context data. Considering Motorola's history, the E6 Play may have slightly better color calibration, but the Nokia C2 Tennen's newer chipset *could* support a marginally more efficient display driver. The absence of information prevents a definitive statement.

Camera Comparison

Camera performance on both devices is expected to be minimal. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. However, given the market segment, both likely feature basic 5MP or 8MP main sensors. The presence of a 2MP macro lens on either device is largely a marketing gimmick, offering limited practical benefit due to the low resolution and lack of optical image stabilization. Image processing will be basic on both, relying heavily on software algorithms to enhance photos, with limited success in low-light conditions.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Nokia C2 Tennen’s Mediatek Helio A22 (16nm) is a clear upgrade over the Motorola Moto E6 Play’s Mediatek MT6739 (28nm). The smaller fabrication process allows for greater transistor density and improved power efficiency. While the A22 has a 2.0 GHz clock speed compared to the MT6739’s 1.5 GHz, the architectural improvements of the A22 are more impactful. This translates to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking, even though both utilize a quad-core Cortex-A53 CPU. The MT6739’s larger process node will likely result in more heat generation under load, potentially leading to performance throttling. Users who intend to run multiple apps or even moderately demanding games will find the Nokia C2 Tennen a more responsive experience.

Battery Life

Battery capacity isn't specified, but both phones likely house batteries in the 3000-4000 mAh range. The Nokia C2 Tennen’s more efficient Helio A22 chipset, built on a 16nm process, will contribute to longer battery life compared to the Moto E6 Play’s 28nm MT6739. While both support 10W wired charging, the Nokia C2 Tennen’s improved power efficiency means it will likely reach a full charge slightly faster and sustain usage for a longer duration on a single charge.

Buying Guide

Buy the Nokia C2 Tennen if you need a phone capable of handling slightly more demanding tasks, such as light multitasking or running updated versions of social media apps, and appreciate the benefits of a more modern chipset architecture. Buy the Motorola Moto E6 Play if your needs are extremely basic – primarily calls, texts, and very light app usage – and you prioritize a potentially lower price point, accepting the performance limitations of its older processor.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Nokia C2 Tennen handle popular social media apps like Facebook and Instagram without significant lag?
The Nokia C2 Tennen, with its Helio A22 chipset, is better equipped to handle social media apps than the Moto E6 Play. While it won't offer a fluid experience, it should provide acceptable performance for browsing feeds and posting updates. The Moto E6 Play may struggle with these apps, especially with multiple tabs or background processes running.
❓ Is the Motorola Moto E6 Play a good option for someone who primarily uses their phone for calls and texts?
Yes, the Motorola Moto E6 Play is a perfectly adequate choice for basic communication. Its older chipset is sufficient for making calls, sending texts, and managing contacts. However, if you anticipate using any apps beyond these core functions, the Nokia C2 Tennen offers a more future-proof experience.
❓ Can either of these phones run modern mobile games?
Neither phone is suitable for playing demanding mobile games. While simple 2D games might be playable at low settings, the Helio A22 and MT6739 chipsets lack the processing power and graphics capabilities to handle modern 3D titles. Expect significant lag and low frame rates.
❓ What version of Android do these phones run?
The Nokia C2 Tennen likely ships with Android Go Edition, a lightweight version of Android designed for low-end hardware. The Motorola Moto E6 Play likely runs a near-stock version of Android, but may not receive significant software updates. Both offer a basic Android experience.