Nokia's C-series aims to deliver affordability without completely sacrificing usability. The C2 2nd Edition represents a baseline entry point, while the C210 introduces Qualcomm's Snapdragon 662 chipset. This comparison dissects the differences to determine which device offers the best value for users prioritizing performance or pure cost savings.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Nokia C210 is the superior choice. The Snapdragon 662 provides a significantly more responsive experience for everyday tasks and even light gaming, justifying the likely price premium over the C2 2nd Edition. However, those on the absolute tightest budget will find the C2 2nd Edition functional.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 |
| 4G bands | LTE | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 28 | 2023, August 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 19 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 154 x 75.9 x 10 mm (6.06 x 2.99 x 0.39 in) | 159.5 x 73.9 x 8.6 mm (6.28 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 167.8 g (5.93 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 480 x 960 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~188 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~273 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~71.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.5 GHz | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | - | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) |
| GPU | - | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition) | Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 1GB RAM, 32GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP | - |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 2 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | 720p | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Yes |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Ion 2400 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 3000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dark Blue, Warm Gray | Gray |
| Models | TA-1468, TA-1454 | - |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 190 EUR |
| SAR | 0.52 W/kg (head) 0.68 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.42 W/kg (head) 1.14 W/kg (body) | - |
Nokia C2 2nd Edition
- Lowest possible price point
- Simple and easy to use
- Functional for basic communication
- Extremely limited performance
- Poor multitasking capabilities
- Unsuitable for gaming or demanding apps
Nokia C210
- Significantly faster performance with Snapdragon 662
- Improved multitasking and app loading times
- Capable of light gaming
- Higher price than the C2 2nd Edition
- Still a budget device with limitations
- Camera quality likely remains basic
Display Comparison
Both devices likely feature similar LCD panels, given their market segment. However, detailed display specs (resolution, brightness) are unavailable. The C210's more powerful chipset *could* translate to better image processing for slightly improved color accuracy, but this is speculative. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both, as minimizing these isn't a priority at this price point. Without specific data, it's safe to assume a comparable viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are sparse for both devices. It's reasonable to assume both feature a basic rear camera setup. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the C210's image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 662 will likely offer superior image processing capabilities, resulting in better dynamic range and noise reduction compared to the C2 2nd Edition. Any 2MP macro or depth sensors on either device should be considered marketing features rather than significant photographic assets.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Nokia C2 2nd Edition's quad-core 1.5 GHz CPU is a basic configuration, suitable only for the most lightweight tasks. In contrast, the Nokia C210 boasts the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, an octa-core processor built on an 11nm process. This means four high-performance Kryo 260 Gold cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and four efficiency cores at 1.8 GHz. This architecture allows for smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive user interface. The Snapdragon 662 also includes an Adreno 610 GPU, enabling basic gaming capabilities absent in the C2 2nd Edition. The 11nm process node also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained use.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, given their similar form factors and target market, battery life is likely comparable. The Snapdragon 662 in the C210 is more power-efficient than the C2 2nd Edition's processor, potentially offsetting any slight difference in battery capacity. Charging wattage is also unknown, but both are likely to support slow charging speeds, meaning a full charge will take several hours.
Buying Guide
Buy the Nokia C2 2nd Edition if you need a phone for extremely basic communication – calls, texts, and minimal app usage – and prioritize the lowest possible price. Buy the Nokia C210 if you prefer a smoother, more capable experience for social media, video streaming, and occasional gaming, and are willing to spend a bit more for improved performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Nokia C210 run popular social media apps like Facebook and Instagram smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 662 in the C210 provides enough processing power to run Facebook, Instagram, and other popular social media apps with a reasonably smooth experience. The C2 2nd Edition would likely struggle with these apps, exhibiting noticeable lag and slowdown.
❓ Can I play games like PUBG Mobile on the Nokia C210?
While the C210 *can* run PUBG Mobile, it won't be a high-end gaming experience. You'll likely need to use the lowest graphics settings and may still encounter occasional frame drops. The C2 2nd Edition is not suitable for PUBG Mobile.
❓ How much storage does each phone have, and can it be expanded?
Storage details are not provided. However, both devices likely offer limited internal storage (e.g., 32GB) and support microSD card expansion, which is crucial for storing photos, videos, and apps.
❓ What version of Android do these phones run?
Both devices likely run a near-stock version of Android Go Edition, optimized for low-end hardware. This helps to conserve resources and provide a smoother experience on limited hardware.
