Looking for an affordable smartphone? The Nokia C2 2nd Edition and C200 are both contenders in the budget market. But which one offers the best value for your money? This comprehensive comparison dives deep into their features, performance, and overall user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Nokia C200 edges out the C2 2nd Edition thanks to its more powerful chipset, faster CPU, and 10W charging. While both are budget options, the C200 provides a slightly better overall experience for everyday tasks and offers a bit more future-proofing.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 41, 66, 71 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE (2CA) |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 28 | 2022, January 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 19 | Available. Released 2022, Q2 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 154 x 75.9 x 10 mm (6.06 x 2.99 x 0.39 in) | 156.5 x 73.1 x 8.8 mm (6.16 x 2.88 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 172.5 g (6.10 oz) |
| | - | Splash protection |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 480 x 960 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~188 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~71.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.09 inches, 91.0 cm2 (~79.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.5 GHz | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | - | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) |
| GPU | - | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition) | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 1GB RAM, 32GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP | 13 MP, AF |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 2 MP | 8 MP |
| Video | 720p | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, proximity, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 2400 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dark Blue, Warm Gray | Meteor Black |
| Models | TA-1468, TA-1454 | TA-1437, TA-1510 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 60 EUR |
| SAR | 0.52 W/kg (head) 0.68 W/kg (body) | 1.11 W/kg (head) 1.33 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.42 W/kg (head) 1.14 W/kg (body) | - |
Nokia C2 2nd Edition
- Simple and easy to use
- Affordable price point
- Reliable Nokia brand
- Lower performance
- Slower charging
- Basic features
Nokia C200
- Better performance thanks to Helio A22
- Faster CPU speed
- 10W charging
- Slightly more modern design
- Still a budget phone with limitations
- Camera quality is basic
- Display may not be the brightest
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar, basic LCD displays, probably around 6.1 inches with a resolution of 720 x 1520 pixels. Expect decent viewing angles and adequate brightness for indoor use, but outdoor visibility might be challenging. The C200 *might* have slightly better color accuracy due to its slightly newer design, but this is speculative without specific display panel details.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are likely to be modest on both devices. Expect a single rear camera, probably around 8-13MP, with basic features like HDR and portrait mode. Image quality will be acceptable in good lighting conditions, but low-light performance will be limited. The C200 *might* have a slightly better camera sensor, but overall, camera performance will be similar.
Performance
Here's where the C200 shines. Its Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 chipset and 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 CPU offer a noticeable performance boost over the C2 2nd Edition's 1.5 GHz quad-core processor. Expect smoother app loading, quicker multitasking, and a more responsive user interface on the C200. The C2 2nd Edition will handle basic tasks adequately, but may struggle with more demanding apps.
Battery Life
Both phones likely feature a battery capacity around 4000mAh. The C200's 10W wired charging offers a slight advantage over the C2 2nd Edition, which likely has slower charging speeds. Battery life should be comparable for typical usage, lasting a full day on a single charge.
Buying Guide
The Nokia C2 2nd Edition is ideal for users prioritizing simplicity and basic functionality. It's a good choice for first-time smartphone users or those needing a secondary device for calls and messaging. The Nokia C200 is better suited for users who want a slightly more responsive experience and appreciate a bit more processing power for light multitasking and occasional gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ What is the difference between the Nokia C2 2nd Edition and C200?
The main difference is the chipset. The C200 has a more powerful Mediatek Helio A22 processor, resulting in better performance and faster charging compared to the C2 2nd Edition's older processor.
❓ Which Nokia phone is better for gaming?
The Nokia C200 is the better choice for light gaming due to its more powerful processor. However, neither phone is designed for demanding games.
