Looking for an affordable smartphone that won't break the bank? The Nokia C2 2nd Edition and Nokia 1.3 are both contenders in the budget segment, offering essential features at attractive price points. But which one delivers the better overall experience?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Nokia 1.3 edges out the C2 2nd Edition thanks to its slightly more efficient chipset and generally better software optimization, resulting in smoother performance. Both are basic phones, but the 1.3 offers a marginally better user experience for the price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28 - International |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 66 - LATAM |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 28 | 2020, March 19. Released 2020, April 02 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 19 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 154 x 75.9 x 10 mm (6.06 x 2.99 x 0.39 in) | 147.3 x 71.2 x 9.4 mm (5.80 x 2.80 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 480 x 960 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~188 ppi density) | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~295 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~71.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.71 inches, 81.4 cm2 (~77.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.5 GHz | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | - | Qualcomm QM215 Snapdragon 215 (28 nm) |
| GPU | - | Adreno 308 |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition) | Android 10 (Go edition), upgradable to Android 11 (Go edition), Android One |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 1GB RAM, 32GB 2GB RAM | 16GB 1GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 5 MP | 8 MP, (wide), AF |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 2 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | 720p | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Ion 2400 mAh, removable | Li-Po 3000 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dark Blue, Warm Gray | Cyan, Charcoal, Sand |
| Models | TA-1468, TA-1454 | TA-1216, TA-1205 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 170 EUR |
| SAR | 0.52 W/kg (head) 0.68 W/kg (body) | 0.64 W/kg (head) 1.17 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.42 W/kg (head) 1.14 W/kg (body) | 0.38 W/kg (head) 0.86 W/kg (body) |
Nokia C2 2nd Edition
- Slightly larger screen
- Affordable price
- Durable build quality (typical of Nokia)
- Lower performance
- Smaller battery
- Basic camera
Nokia 1.3
- Better performance (Snapdragon 215)
- Longer battery life
- Compact design
- Smaller screen
- Basic camera
- Limited storage
Display Comparison
Both phones feature small, basic LCD displays. The C2 2nd Edition has a slightly larger 5.7-inch screen compared to the 1.3's 5.45-inch display. Expect similar resolution and color accuracy – neither excels in this area.
Camera Comparison
Both phones have basic cameras. The Nokia 1.3 typically features an 8MP rear camera, while the C2 2nd Edition has a similar resolution. Image quality is adequate for casual snapshots in good lighting conditions, but don't expect stellar results.
Performance
The Nokia 1.3's Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 chipset, while clocked slightly lower at 1.3 GHz, often performs better than the C2 2nd Edition's unnamed quad-core 1.5 GHz processor due to Qualcomm's optimization. Expect slightly smoother app loading and navigation on the 1.3.
Battery Life
The Nokia 1.3 boasts a larger 4000mAh battery compared to the C2 2nd Edition's 3000mAh. This translates to noticeably longer battery life on the 1.3, easily lasting a full day with moderate use.
Buying Guide
The Nokia C2 2nd Edition is ideal for users who prioritize a slightly larger screen and basic calling/texting functionality. The Nokia 1.3 is a better choice for those needing a bit more performance for light social media use and occasional photography.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ What operating system do these phones use?
Both phones run a Go edition of Android, optimized for low-powered devices. This means a lighter, faster experience with fewer pre-installed apps.
❓ How much storage do these phones offer?
Both typically offer limited storage (16GB or 32GB), but both support microSD card expansion for additional storage.