Nokia C12 Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi 12C: A Deep Dive into Budget Smartphone Performance

The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive, demanding a careful balance of features and performance. Both the Nokia C12 Plus and Xiaomi Redmi 12C aim to deliver an affordable Android experience, but they take different approaches. The Nokia prioritizes a clean software experience, while the Redmi 12C focuses on a more powerful chipset. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you choose the right device.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi 12C is the better choice. Its MediaTek Helio G85 chipset, built on a more efficient 12nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Nokia C12 Plus’ Unisoc SC9863A1. While both offer similar battery life, the Redmi 12C’s faster processor makes it more capable for multitasking and light gaming.

PHONES
Phone Names Nokia C12 Plus Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bandsLTE1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE
 -CDMA2000 1xEV-DO
Launch
Announced2023, April 012022, December 31
StatusCancelledAvailable. Released 2023, January 01
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic back, plastic frame-
Dimensions-168.8 x 76.4 x 8.8 mm (6.65 x 3.01 x 0.35 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight-192 g (6.77 oz)
Display
Resolution720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~267 ppi density)720 x 1650 pixels (~268 ppi density)
Size6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio)6.71 inches, 106.5 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD, 500 nits (typ)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetUnisoc SC9863A1 (22 nm)Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)
GPUIMG8322Mali-G52 MC2
OSAndroid 12 (Go edition)Android 12, MIUI 13
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXCmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal32GB 2GB RAM32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM
 eMMC 5.1eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
Dual-50 MP, (wide), PDAF 0.08 MP (depth)
FeaturesLED flash, HDRLED flash, HDR
Single8 MP, AF50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", PDAF Auxiliary lens
VideoYes1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single5 MP5 MP, f/2.2, (wide)
Video720p1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.2, A2DP5.1, A2DP, LE
NFCNoYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPSGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
RadioFM radioFM radio
USBmicroUSB 2.0microUSB 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/nWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsAccelerometer, proximityFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer
 -Virtual proximity sensing
Battery
Charging-10W wired
TypeLi-Ion 4000 mAh, removableLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsDark Cyan, Charcoal, Light MintGraphite Gray, Ocean Blue, Mint Green, Lavender Purple
Models-22120RN86G, 22120RN86I, 22126RN91Y, 2212ARNC4L
PriceAbout 90 EUR£ 132.99 / € 107.41
SAR-1.08 W/kg (head)     0.64 W/kg (body)
SAR EU-0.98 W/kg (head)     0.99 W/kg (body)

Nokia C12 Plus

  • Clean Android experience with potential for timely updates
  • Slightly more compact and pocketable design
  • Potentially lower price point (depending on region)

  • Significantly weaker processor performance
  • Less responsive user experience
  • Limited gaming capabilities

Xiaomi Redmi 12C

  • More powerful MediaTek Helio G85 chipset
  • Larger display for a more immersive experience
  • Faster charging (10W)

  • Potentially more bloatware and ads
  • Larger form factor may be less comfortable for some
  • Software update support may be less consistent

Display Comparison

Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, a common trait in this price bracket. However, the Redmi 12C benefits from a larger 6.71-inch screen compared to the Nokia C12 Plus’ 6.3-inch display, offering a more immersive viewing experience. While specific brightness data is unavailable, the Redmi 12C’s larger surface area may translate to slightly better perceived brightness. Color accuracy and viewing angles are expected to be similar, leaning towards basic performance rather than color-critical work.

Camera Comparison

Camera performance is likely to be similar, with both devices featuring basic camera setups. Details on sensor sizes are unavailable, but both are expected to rely on budget sensors. The Redmi 12C’s camera system is likely to benefit from MediaTek’s image signal processor (ISP), potentially offering slightly better image processing and noise reduction. However, don't expect flagship-level image quality from either device. Both will struggle in low-light conditions, and the 2MP macro cameras on both are largely marketing features with limited practical utility.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi 12C’s MediaTek Helio G85 (12nm) is significantly more powerful than the Nokia C12 Plus’ Unisoc SC9863A1 (22nm). The Helio G85 features two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz, providing a substantial boost in single-core performance compared to the C12 Plus’ four Cortex-A55 cores at 1.6 GHz. This translates to snappier app launches, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the Redmi 12C. The 12nm process also contributes to better power efficiency, potentially mitigating the performance gap under sustained loads. The Unisoc chip in the Nokia C12 Plus is geared towards basic functionality, suitable for calls, texts, and light app usage.

Battery Life

Both phones feature similar battery capacities, likely around 5000mAh, offering all-day battery life for moderate usage. However, the Redmi 12C’s 10W charging is a slight advantage, allowing for a faster (though still slow by modern standards) recharge compared to the Nokia C12 Plus, which likely has a similar charging rate. The Helio G85’s more efficient 12nm process may also contribute to slightly better battery endurance under heavy load, but the difference is unlikely to be substantial.

Buying Guide

Buy the Nokia C12 Plus if you prioritize a guaranteed clean Android experience with timely security updates and a slightly more compact form factor. It’s ideal for users who primarily need a phone for basic communication and light tasks. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 12C if you value performance and responsiveness for the price. It’s better suited for users who enjoy occasional gaming, social media browsing, and multitasking, even if it means accepting a potentially more cluttered software experience.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Redmi 12C struggle with popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook?
No, the Helio G85 in the Redmi 12C is more than capable of handling everyday apps like WhatsApp, Facebook, and YouTube. While it won't offer a flagship-level experience, it will provide a smooth and responsive experience for these common tasks. The Nokia C12 Plus may exhibit noticeable lag when switching between these apps.
❓ Is the Redmi 12C suitable for playing mobile games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Redmi 12C can run PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile, but you'll need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to achieve playable frame rates. The Helio G85 is a gaming-focused chipset, but it's not powerful enough for high-end graphics settings. The Nokia C12 Plus will struggle significantly with these games, even on the lowest settings.
❓ How often can I expect software updates on the Nokia C12 Plus?
Nokia is known for providing relatively timely security updates, even on its budget devices. While major Android version updates are less frequent, you can expect regular security patches for the Nokia C12 Plus, offering a degree of protection against vulnerabilities. Xiaomi's update schedule for the Redmi 12C is less predictable.
❓ Does the Redmi 12C have a headphone jack?
Yes, the Xiaomi Redmi 12C retains a 3.5mm headphone jack, allowing you to connect wired headphones or speakers. This is a convenient feature for users who prefer not to rely on Bluetooth connectivity.