The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive, catering to first-time buyers, users needing a reliable backup device, or those simply seeking affordability. The Nokia C12 Plus and Oppo A17k represent two compelling options, but their internal differences dictate vastly different user experiences. This comparison breaks down the key specs to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo A17k emerges as the better choice. Its Mediatek Helio G35 chipset, built on a more efficient 12nm process, delivers noticeably snappier performance than the Nokia C12 Plus’s Unisoc SC9863A1. While both phones prioritize battery life, the A17k’s superior processing power allows for a more fluid overall experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 01 | 2022, October 13 |
| Status | Cancelled | Available. Released 2022, October 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | - | 164.2 x 75.6 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IPX4 water resistance |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Panda Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A1 (22 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio G35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | IMG8322 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 12 (Go edition) | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 64GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, AF | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 720p | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Ion 4000 mAh, removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dark Cyan, Charcoal, Light Mint | Navy Blue, Gold |
| Models | - | CPH2471 |
| Price | About 90 EUR | About 130 EUR |
Nokia C12 Plus
- Extremely affordable price point
- Simple and clean Android experience
- Potentially longer standby time due to lower power consumption
- Significantly slower performance
- Struggles with multitasking and demanding apps
- Less responsive user interface
Oppo A17k
- Noticeably faster performance
- More efficient chipset for better battery life under load
- Smoother user experience and app responsiveness
- Slightly higher price
- Camera performance is still basic
- Charging speeds are likely slow
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, a common trait in this price bracket. However, details like brightness and color accuracy are unavailable. The focus here is on usability, and the screen size is similar. The absence of high refresh rates or advanced features like LTPO is expected at this price point. Bezels are likely substantial on both, maximizing screen real estate within a compact form factor.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar – basic. Both phones likely feature a primary camera and a depth sensor, with the Oppo A17k potentially having a slight edge due to its more powerful processor enabling better image processing. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering minimal practical benefit. Expect acceptable results in well-lit conditions, but significant noise and lack of detail in low light. Focusing on the primary sensor’s megapixel count (if available) is more indicative of potential image quality than the presence of auxiliary lenses.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A17k’s Mediatek Helio G35 (12nm) is a clear upgrade over the Nokia C12 Plus’s Unisoc SC9863A1 (22nm). The 12nm process node translates to better power efficiency and reduced heat generation. While both are octa-core CPUs, the A17k utilizes Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2.3 GHz, compared to the C12 Plus’s mix of A55 cores at 1.6 GHz and 1.2 GHz. This means the A17k will exhibit faster app launch times, smoother scrolling, and a more responsive user interface. The A17k’s GPU will also provide a better, though still limited, gaming experience. The C12 Plus will struggle with even moderately demanding applications.
Battery Life
Battery life will be a strong suit for both devices, given their low-power chipsets and likely modest display resolutions. While specific battery capacities are not provided, both should easily last a full day of moderate use. The Oppo A17k’s more efficient chipset may offer a slight advantage in longevity. Charging speeds are also likely to be similar – slow. Expect several hours for a full charge from 0-100% using the included charger.
Buying Guide
Buy the Nokia C12 Plus if you prioritize extreme affordability and a simple, uncluttered Android experience, and your usage is limited to basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media. Buy the Oppo A17k if you prefer a more responsive device capable of handling slightly more demanding apps and multitasking, even if it means spending a little extra. The A17k is better suited for users who occasionally browse the web or play casual games.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Oppo A17k be able to run popular social media apps like Facebook and Instagram smoothly?
Yes, the Mediatek Helio G35 chipset in the Oppo A17k is capable of running social media apps like Facebook and Instagram without significant lag. While it won't offer a high-end experience, it will provide a usable and responsive experience for everyday social media browsing.
❓ Is the Unisoc SC9863A1 in the Nokia C12 Plus sufficient for basic communication – calls, texts, and WhatsApp?
Yes, the Unisoc SC9863A1 is adequate for basic communication tasks. Calls, texts, and WhatsApp will function reliably, but expect slower app loading times and potential stuttering when switching between apps. It's best suited for users with minimal smartphone needs.
❓ Can either of these phones handle mobile gaming beyond very casual titles?
Neither phone is designed for serious mobile gaming. While both can run very simple games, expect low frame rates and significant lag in more demanding titles. The Oppo A17k will offer a slightly better experience, but it's still not ideal for gaming.
❓ What type of storage does the Oppo A17k use, and is it expandable?
While not explicitly stated, budget phones like the Oppo A17k typically use eMMC storage. It almost certainly includes a microSD card slot for expandable storage, allowing you to add more space for photos, videos, and apps. Check the product specifications for the maximum supported microSD card capacity.
