Oppo A17k vs Nokia C110: A Detailed Comparison for Budget Buyers

The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. Both the Nokia C110 and Oppo A17k aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an accessible price point. However, they achieve this with different chipsets and design philosophies. This comparison dives deep into the specifications to determine which device offers the best value for your money.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Oppo A17k emerges as the better choice. Its Mediatek Helio G35 chipset, with higher clock speeds, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Nokia C110’s Helio P22, making it more responsive for everyday tasks and light gaming. While both offer basic functionality, the A17k’s slightly improved processing power justifies the potential price difference.

PHONES
Phone Names Nokia C110 Oppo A17k
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 1700 / 1900HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bands2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 41, 66, 711, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2023, June 022022, October 13
StatusAvailable. Released 2023, June 14Available. Released 2022, October 18
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic back, plastic frame-
Dimensions160.8 x 74 x 8.5 mm (6.33 x 2.91 x 0.33 in)164.2 x 75.6 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in)
SIMNano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight172 g (6.07 oz)189 g (6.67 oz)
 -IPX4 water resistance
Display
ProtectionScratch-resistant glassPanda Glass
Resolution720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~273 ppi density)720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density)
Size6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~81.9% screen-to-body ratio)6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, 400 nits (typ)IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)
ChipsetMediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm)Mediatek MT6765 Helio G35 (12 nm)
GPUPowerVR GE8320PowerVR GE8320
OSAndroid 12Android 12, ColorOS 12.1
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDXC
Internal32GB 3GB RAM64GB 3GB RAM
 -eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDRLED flash, panorama
Single13 MP, (wide), AF8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single5 MP5 MP, f/2.2, (wide)
VideoYes1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack -Yes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
NFCNoNo
PositioningGPSGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
RadioFM radioUnspecified
USBUSB Type-C 2.0microUSB 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, hotspotWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band
Features
SensorsAccelerometer, proximity, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging5W wired-
TypeLi-Po 3000 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsGrayNavy Blue, Gold
ModelsN156DLCPH2471
PriceAbout 100 EURAbout 130 EUR

Nokia C110

  • Clean Android experience (likely)
  • Strong brand reputation for reliability
  • Potentially slightly better battery life due to less powerful chipset

  • Slower processor (Helio P22)
  • Less responsive user experience
  • Limited gaming capabilities

Oppo A17k

  • Faster processor (Helio G35)
  • More responsive user interface
  • Better performance for multitasking and light gaming

  • Oppo’s ColorOS may include bloatware
  • Potentially shorter battery life due to more powerful chipset
  • Brand perception may be less premium than Nokia

Display Comparison

Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, typical for this price bracket. Detailed display specs (resolution, brightness) are unavailable, but the focus here is on performance, not visual fidelity. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both, maximizing screen real estate within a compact form factor. Color accuracy will likely be standard for budget phones, prioritizing power efficiency over color calibration.

Camera Comparison

Camera performance is expected to be similar, and largely dependent on software processing. Both phones likely feature a primary camera and a depth sensor. Given the price point, image quality will be acceptable in good lighting conditions but will struggle in low light. The absence of detailed sensor information suggests neither phone will excel in photography. Focusing on megapixel counts alone is misleading; image processing and sensor size are far more critical, and data on these is unavailable.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A17k’s Mediatek Helio G35 features a CPU clocked up to 2.3 GHz, compared to the Nokia C110’s Helio P22 which peaks at 2.0 GHz. While both are octa-core designs utilizing Cortex-A53 cores, the higher clock speed of the G35 translates to faster processing. The G35’s 4x1.8 GHz cores also offer a slight advantage over the P22’s 4x1.5 GHz cores. This means the A17k will feel snappier when launching apps, browsing the web, and switching between tasks. The Helio G35 also has a slightly more capable GPU, offering a better, though still limited, gaming experience.

Battery Life

Both devices are equipped with basic charging capabilities – the Nokia C110 at 5W. The Oppo A17k’s charging speed is not specified, but is likely similar. Battery capacity is also not specified for either device. However, given the less demanding chipset in the Nokia C110, it may achieve slightly longer battery life on a single charge, despite potentially having a smaller capacity. The low charging wattage on both means a full charge will take several hours.

Buying Guide

Buy the Nokia C110 if you prioritize a clean Android experience and brand reliability above all else, and your usage is limited to very basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media. Buy the Oppo A17k if you need a phone that can handle multitasking, streaming video, and casual gaming with a bit more fluidity, and are comfortable with Oppo’s ColorOS software.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Oppo A17k be able to run popular social media apps like TikTok and Instagram smoothly?
Yes, the Mediatek Helio G35 in the Oppo A17k provides sufficient processing power to run popular social media apps like TikTok and Instagram without significant lag. While it won't offer a high-end experience, it will be usable for casual browsing and content creation.
❓ Is the Nokia C110 a good choice for someone who primarily uses their phone for calls and texts?
Absolutely. The Nokia C110’s Helio P22 chipset is perfectly adequate for basic communication tasks like making calls and sending texts. Its focus on simplicity and reliability makes it a solid option for users who prioritize these core functions over advanced features.
❓ Can either of these phones handle basic mobile games like Candy Crush or Subway Surfers?
Both phones can handle simple 2D games like Candy Crush or Subway Surfers, but the Oppo A17k will provide a smoother experience due to its more powerful Helio G35 chipset. Expect lower frame rates and potential lag on the Nokia C110 with more demanding games.
❓ What kind of storage options are available on these phones, and can it be expanded?
Storage details are not provided in the context data. However, budget phones in this segment typically offer 32GB or 64GB of internal storage. Both devices likely support microSD card expansion, allowing you to increase storage capacity for photos, videos, and other files.