Looking for an affordable smartphone that delivers reliable performance? The Nokia C100 and C200 are both contenders in the budget segment, offering a familiar Nokia experience. But which one is the better choice for your needs? Let's dive into a detailed comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Nokia C200 edges out the C100 thanks to its slightly faster charging. Both phones share the same core processor and offer a similar user experience, making the C200 a marginally better value proposition for those prioritizing a bit more convenience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 41, 66, 71 | 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 41, 66, 71 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE (2CA) |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 05 | 2022, January 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, Q2 | Available. Released 2022, Q2 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 149.6 x 71.9 x 9.7 mm (5.89 x 2.83 x 0.38 in) | 156.5 x 73.1 x 8.8 mm (6.16 x 2.88 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 172.5 g (6.10 oz) |
| | Splash protection | Splash protection |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~295 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.45 inches, 76.7 cm2 (~71.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.09 inches, 91.0 cm2 (~79.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, AF | 13 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Video | 720p | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, barometer | Accelerometer, proximity, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue | Meteor Black |
| Models | TA-1484, TA-1520, N152DL | TA-1437, TA-1510 |
| Price | About 50 EUR | About 60 EUR |
| SAR | 1.03 W/kg (head) 1.35 W/kg (body) | 1.11 W/kg (head) 1.33 W/kg (body) |
Nokia C100
- Reliable Nokia brand
- Affordable price
- Decent battery life
- Large display for media consumption
- Slow performance
- Basic camera
- No fast charging (typically)
- Limited storage
Nokia C200
- Reliable Nokia brand
- Affordable price
- Decent battery life
- Large display for media consumption
- 10W fast charging
- Slow performance
- Basic camera
- Limited storage
Display Comparison
Both the Nokia C100 and C200 typically feature a 6.5-inch HD+ (720 x 1600) IPS LCD display. Expect similar viewing experiences – adequate for everyday use but not exceptional. Color accuracy and brightness are typical for this price range. The C200 might have a slightly newer panel, but the difference is negligible.
Camera Comparison
The Nokia C100 usually features a 13MP main camera and a 2MP depth sensor. The Nokia C200 typically has a 13MP main camera and a 2MP depth sensor as well. Image quality is acceptable in good lighting conditions, but expect noise and limited detail in low light. Video recording capabilities are basic, likely limited to 1080p at 30fps.
Performance
Performance is virtually identical. Both phones are powered by the Mediatek Helio A22 chipset with a quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 CPU. Don't expect blazing speeds; these phones are designed for basic tasks. Multitasking with many apps simultaneously will likely result in slowdowns. Gaming is limited to less demanding titles.
Battery Life
Both phones typically house a 4000mAh battery. However, the C200 benefits from 10W wired charging, while the C100 often lacks a specified charging speed (likely 5W). This means the C200 will charge noticeably faster.
Buying Guide
The Nokia C100 is ideal for users seeking a basic, no-frills smartphone for essential tasks like calls, texts, and light browsing. The Nokia C200 is a better fit for those who want a slightly more convenient charging experience and a bit more future-proofing, even within the budget category.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ What is the difference between the Nokia C100 and C200?
The primary difference is the charging speed. The C200 supports 10W wired charging, while the C100 typically uses slower charging. Otherwise, they share similar specs and features.
❓ Are these phones good for gaming?
No, these phones are not ideal for gaming. Their processors are designed for basic tasks, and demanding games will likely run poorly or not at all.
