Looking for an affordable smartphone that gets the job done? The Nokia C100 and C1 2nd Edition are both contenders in the budget phone arena. But which one offers the best value for your money? Let's dive into a detailed comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Nokia C100 edges out the C1 2nd Edition thanks to its slightly more powerful chipset and processor, resulting in a smoother overall experience. However, the C1 2nd Edition might offer a more competitive price point, making it a worthwhile consideration for extremely budget-conscious buyers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 41, 66, 71 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 05 | 2021, July 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, Q2 | Available. Released 2021, August 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 149.6 x 71.9 x 9.7 mm (5.89 x 2.83 x 0.38 in) | 148 x 71.8 x 9.3 mm (5.83 x 2.83 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 154 g (5.43 oz) |
| | Splash protection | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~295 ppi density) | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~295 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.45 inches, 76.7 cm2 (~71.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.45 inches, 76.7 cm2 (~72.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) | Unisoc SC7731e |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-400 MP2 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 16GB 1GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, AF | 5 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | 720p | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, barometer | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 2500 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue | Blue, Purple |
| Models | TA-1484, TA-1520, N152DL | TA-1380 |
| Price | About 50 EUR | About 50 EUR |
| SAR | 1.03 W/kg (head) 1.35 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.44 W/kg (body) |
Nokia C100
- Slightly faster processor
- More responsive performance
- Potentially better display panel
- Nokia's reputation for reliability
- May be slightly more expensive
- Camera performance is still limited
- Basic design
Nokia C1 2nd Edition
- Lower price point
- Decent battery life
- Simple and easy to use
- Nokia brand
- Slower performance
- Less responsive user interface
- Limited camera capabilities
- Older chipset
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature a similar 6.5-inch HD+ display, offering adequate viewing for everyday tasks. Expect decent brightness and color accuracy for the price range, but don't anticipate flagship-level visuals. The C100 might have a slightly better panel due to potentially newer manufacturing processes, but the difference will be minimal.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are likely to be similar on both devices, probably featuring a single rear camera around 8-13MP. Image quality will be acceptable in good lighting conditions, but expect noise and limited detail in low light. The C100's slightly more powerful processor *might* allow for marginally better image processing, but don't expect a significant difference.
Performance
Here's where the C100 has a clear advantage. The Mediatek Helio A22 chipset and 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 CPU are noticeably faster than the Unisoc SC7731e and 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 in the C1 2nd Edition. Expect smoother app loading, quicker multitasking, and a more responsive user interface on the C100. The C1 2nd Edition will handle basic tasks adequately, but may struggle with more demanding apps or games.
Battery Life
Both phones are expected to have a battery capacity around 4000mAh, providing all-day battery life with moderate usage. Battery optimization will play a crucial role, and Nokia's software typically offers decent power management. A draw here, assuming similar software optimization.
Buying Guide
The Nokia C100 is ideal for users who prioritize a bit more performance and a slightly more modern feel, even on a tight budget. The Nokia C1 2nd Edition is a great choice for those seeking the absolute lowest price and basic smartphone functionality – perfect for first-time smartphone users or as a secondary device.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ What is the difference between the Nokia C100 and C1 2nd Edition?
The main difference lies in the chipset. The C100 has a Mediatek Helio A22, while the C1 2nd Edition uses a Unisoc SC7731e. This results in a noticeable performance difference, with the C100 being faster.
❓ Which Nokia phone is better for gaming?
The Nokia C100 is the better choice for light gaming due to its more powerful processor. However, neither phone is designed for demanding games.
