Looking for an affordable smartphone that delivers reliable performance? The Nokia C100 and Nokia 1.4 are both contenders in the budget segment, offering essential features at attractive price points. But which one is the better choice for your needs?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Nokia C100 edges out the Nokia 1.4 thanks to its slightly more powerful chipset and processor, resulting in a smoother overall experience. However, the Nokia 1.4 boasts a more modern design and potentially better camera software optimization. It's a close call, but the C100 offers a bit more performance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 17, 28, 66 - LATAM, USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 05 | 2021, February 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, Q2 | Available. Released 2021, February 03 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 149.6 x 71.9 x 9.7 mm (5.89 x 2.83 x 0.38 in) | 166.4 x 76.7 x 8.7 mm (6.55 x 3.02 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| | Splash protection | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~295 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.45 inches, 76.7 cm2 (~71.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~80.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) | Qualcomm QM215 Snapdragon 215 (28 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 308 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 10 (Go edition), planned upgrade to Android 11 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 16GB 1GB RAM, 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 8 MP, (wide), AF
2 MP (macro) |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, AF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | 720p | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, barometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue | Fjord, Charcoal, Dusk |
| Models | TA-1484, TA-1520, N152DL | TA-1322 |
| Price | About 50 EUR | About 90 EUR |
| SAR | 1.03 W/kg (head) 1.35 W/kg (body) | - |
Nokia C100
- Slightly more powerful chipset
- Larger display
- Reliable Nokia build quality
- Decent battery life
- Basic camera features
- Plastic build may feel less premium
- Limited storage options
Nokia 1.4
- Compact and ergonomic design
- Clean Android experience
- Potentially better camera software
- Durable build
- Less powerful chipset
- Smaller display
- Can feel sluggish with multiple apps open
Display Comparison
Both phones feature HD+ displays, but the Nokia C100 generally has a slightly larger screen size (around 6.5 inches vs. 6.5 inches for the 1.4). Expect similar viewing experiences with adequate brightness and color reproduction for everyday use. The C100's larger size might be preferable for media consumption.
Camera Comparison
The Nokia 1.4 typically features a 13MP main camera with depth sensor, while the C100 has a similar setup. While megapixel count is not everything, the Nokia 1.4's software optimization might provide slightly better image quality in certain conditions. Both phones offer basic camera features suitable for casual photography.
Performance
The Nokia C100's Mediatek Helio A22 chipset and 2.0 GHz CPU offer a noticeable performance advantage over the Nokia 1.4's Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 and 1.3 GHz CPU. This translates to snappier app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a generally more responsive user experience. However, both are still budget devices and shouldn't be expected to handle demanding games or applications.
Battery Life
Both phones are equipped with 4000mAh batteries, suggesting comparable battery life. Real-world usage will depend on individual habits, but both should comfortably last a full day on moderate use.
Buying Guide
The Nokia C100 is ideal for users prioritizing basic performance and a slightly larger screen for media consumption. The Nokia 1.4 is a good fit for those who value a cleaner design, a more compact form factor, and potentially a slightly better camera experience, even if it means sacrificing a bit of processing power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has more RAM?
Both typically come with 3GB of RAM, though configurations may vary by region.
❓ What operating system do these phones run?
Both run Android Go Edition, optimized for lower-powered devices.
