Looking for an affordable smartphone? The Nokia C1 2nd Edition and C10 are both contenders in the budget segment, offering reliable performance and the Nokia brand. But which one delivers the best value? This comprehensive comparison will help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Nokia C10 edges out the C1 2nd Edition due to its slightly more efficient chipset (28nm vs. unknown for C1 2nd) and generally better availability. Both offer basic functionality, but the C10 provides a marginally smoother experience for everyday tasks.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 05 | 2021, April 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August 27 | Available. Released 2021, June 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 148 x 71.8 x 9.3 mm (5.83 x 2.83 x 0.37 in) | 169.9 x 77.9 x 8.8 mm (6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 154 g (5.43 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Panda Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~295 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.45 inches, 76.7 cm2 (~72.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~77.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC7731e | Unisoc SC7331E (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-400 MP2 | Mali-400 MP2 |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition) | Android 11 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 1GB RAM | 16GB 1GB RAM, 16GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 1GB RAM, 32GB 2GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 720p |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Ion 2500 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Purple | Gray, Light Purple |
| Models | TA-1380 | TA-1342 |
| Price | About 50 EUR | About 80 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.44 W/kg (body) | 0.36 W/kg (head) 1.44 W/kg (body) |
Nokia C1 2nd Edition
- Nokia Brand Reliability
- Affordable Price
- Decent Display Size
- Potentially Less Efficient Chipset
- Limited Availability
- Basic Performance
Nokia C10
- Slightly Better Performance
- More Efficient Chipset (28nm)
- Generally Better Availability
- Basic Camera Quality
- Limited Storage
- Entry-Level Performance
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.5-inch HD+ display, offering decent viewing angles for their price range. Expect similar color accuracy and brightness levels. The C10 might have slightly better outdoor visibility due to potential minor differences in panel technology, but it's negligible.
Camera Comparison
Both phones typically feature a dual-camera setup on the rear (likely 8MP + 2MP) and a 5MP front-facing camera. Image quality is basic, suitable for casual snapshots in good lighting conditions. Low-light performance will be poor on both. The C10 might have a slight edge in image processing due to its slightly more advanced chipset.
Performance
Performance is where the differences become more apparent. While both utilize a Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 CPU, the C10's Unisoc SC7331E chipset (28nm) is generally more efficient than the C1 2nd Edition's Unisoc SC7731e (manufacturing process unknown, likely larger than 28nm). This translates to slightly better app loading times and smoother multitasking on the C10. Don't expect blazing speeds from either device.
Battery Life
Both phones are expected to have a 4000mAh battery, providing all-day battery life with moderate usage. Battery optimization will be key, and both devices will benefit from limiting background app activity.
Buying Guide
The Nokia C1 2nd Edition is ideal for users needing a basic phone for calls, texts, and occasional light app usage, prioritizing brand recognition. The Nokia C10 is a better choice for those seeking slightly improved performance and a more readily available device, still within a tight budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ What is the difference between the Unisoc SC7731e and SC7331E chipsets?
The SC7331E is built on a 28nm process, generally leading to better power efficiency and slightly improved performance compared to the SC7731e, which has an unknown (likely larger) manufacturing process.
❓ Can I play games on these phones?
Both phones are suitable for very basic, lightweight games. Demanding titles will likely struggle to run smoothly due to the limited processing power and RAM.
