Looking for an affordable smartphone that doesn't completely break the bank? The Nokia C02 and Motorola Moto E13 are both contenders in the budget phone arena. But which one offers the best bang for your buck? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you make the right choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Motorola Moto E13 takes the crown. Its superior chipset, octa-core CPU, and faster charging provide a noticeably smoother experience and quicker power-ups compared to the Nokia C02's quad-core processor. While both are budget options, the E13 offers better overall performance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 23 | 2023, January 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May | Available. Released 2023, February 13 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 148.7 x 71.2 x 10 mm (5.85 x 2.80 x 0.39 in) | 164.2 x 75 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 179.5 g (6.35 oz) |
| | Splash and dust resistant | Water-resistant design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~295 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.45 inches, 76.7 cm2 (~72.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.4 GHz | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | - | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) |
| GPU | - | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 12 (Go edition) | Android 13 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 2 MP | 5 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio, recording |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dark Cyan, Charcoal | Cosmic Black, Creamy White, Aurora Green |
| Price | - | $ 119.99 / € 104.99 |
Nokia C02
- Simple and easy to use
- Durable build quality (typical of Nokia)
- Affordable price
- Slow performance
- Basic camera
- No fast charging
- Limited storage
Motorola Moto E13
- Faster performance
- Better camera
- Faster charging
- More modern design
- Software updates may be slower
- Plastic build feels less premium
- Can still struggle with demanding games
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature a 6.5-inch HD+ display, offering decent viewing angles for the price. Expect similar color accuracy and brightness levels. The Moto E13 might have a slightly more modern panel, but the difference will be minimal.
Camera Comparison
The Nokia C02 likely features a basic single rear camera (8MP), while the Moto E13 is expected to have a 50MP main camera. While megapixels aren't everything, the E13's sensor should capture more detail and perform better in low-light conditions. Both will likely offer basic selfie cameras (5MP).
Performance
This is where the Moto E13 shines. The Unisoc T606 chipset with its octa-core CPU significantly outperforms the Nokia C02's quad-core processor. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive user interface on the Moto E13. The C02 will feel noticeably slower.
Battery Life
Both phones are expected to have a 5000mAh battery, offering all-day battery life under moderate usage. However, the Moto E13's 10W wired charging is a significant advantage over the C02, which likely lacks fast charging support.
Buying Guide
The Nokia C02 is ideal for users who prioritize simplicity and basic functionality, needing a phone primarily for calls, texts, and very light app usage. The Motorola Moto E13 is better suited for those who want a slightly more responsive experience, occasional gaming, and faster charging capabilities.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Motorola Moto E13 is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful processor. While neither phone is a gaming powerhouse, the E13 will handle casual games much more smoothly.
❓ How much storage do these phones offer?
Both phones typically come with 32GB of internal storage, expandable via microSD card. Storage options may vary by region.
