Nokia's revival of classic designs continues with the 8210 4G and 6300 4G. Both offer 4G connectivity in a nostalgic package, but which one delivers the better experience? This comparison dives deep into their features, performance, and overall value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Nokia 6300 4G edges out the 8210 4G thanks to its slightly more powerful chipset and improved overall performance. While both are great for basic use, the 6300 4G offers a smoother experience and a more refined design, justifying its slightly higher price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20 - APAC, EU, RUCIS | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 - ROW |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 40 - LATAM | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 17, 28, 66, 71 - Americas |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 12 | 2020, November 13. Released 2021, January 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 28 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 131.3 x 56.2 x 13.8 mm (5.17 x 2.21 x 0.54 in) | 131.4 x 53 x 13.7 mm (5.17 x 2.09 x 0.54 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 107 g (3.77 oz) | 104.7 g (3.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~143 ppi density) | 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~167 ppi density) |
| Size | 2.8 inches, 24.3 cm2 (~32.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 2.4 inches, 17.8 cm2 (~25.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD | TFT LCD, 16M colors |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | 1.0 GHz Cortex-A7 | Quad-core 1.1 GHz Cortex-A7 |
| Chipset | Unisoc T107 (22 nm) | Qualcomm QC8909 Snapdragon 210 (28 nm) |
| GPU | - | Adreno 304 |
| OS | - | KaiOS 2.5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | Yes | - |
| Card slot | microSDHC | microSDHC |
| Internal | 128MB 48MB RAM | 4GB 512MB RAM |
| Phonebook | Yes | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 0.3 MP | VGA |
| Video | Unspecified | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.0, A2DP |
| NFC | No | - |
| Positioning | No | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | No | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Games | Yes | - |
| Java | No | - |
| Messaging | SMS, MMS | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Ion 1450 mAh, removable | Removable Li-Ion 1500 mAh battery |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sand, Blue, Red | Light Charcoal, White, Cyan Green |
| Models | TA-1507, TA-1494, TA-1489, TA-1485, TA-1483 | TA-1294, TA-1291, TA-1287, TA-1286 |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 80 EUR |
| SAR | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.77 W/kg (body) |
Nokia 8210 4G
- Iconic 90s design
- Compact and lightweight
- Affordable price
- 4G connectivity
- Slow performance
- Small screen
- Basic camera
- Limited storage
Nokia 6300 4G
- Improved performance
- Slightly larger screen
- Better battery life
- Modernized design while retaining retro charm
- Dual SIM support
- Higher price than 8210 4G
- Still a basic feature phone
- Camera quality is limited
Display Comparison
Both phones feature relatively small, 2.4-inch QVGA displays. The 6300 4G's screen is marginally brighter and offers slightly better viewing angles, though both are adequate for basic tasks like texting and browsing. The 8210 4G's screen is smaller, contributing to its more compact form factor.
Camera Comparison
Both phones have a basic 2MP rear camera. Image quality is similar on both, producing acceptable results in good lighting conditions but struggling in low light. Don't expect high-quality photography from either device.
Performance
The Nokia 6300 4G's Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage over the 8210 4G's Unisoc T107. Apps load faster, and the overall user interface feels more responsive on the 6300 4G. The 8210 4G can feel sluggish at times, especially when multitasking.
Battery Life
The Nokia 6300 4G boasts a larger 1500mAh battery compared to the 8210 4G's 1400mAh. This translates to slightly better battery life, typically lasting a full day with moderate use. Both phones support basic charging.
Buying Guide
The Nokia 8210 4G is ideal for those prioritizing a truly iconic, compact design and a budget-friendly price. The Nokia 6300 4G is better suited for users who want a more responsive experience, a slightly larger screen, and a more modern feel while still embracing the retro aesthetic.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Are these phones good for gaming?
No, neither phone is suitable for gaming. Their processors are designed for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light web browsing. Demanding games will not run.
❓ Can I use WhatsApp on these phones?
Yes, both phones support WhatsApp, but performance may be limited, especially on the 8210 4G. Expect some lag and slower loading times.
