The Nokia 3310 and 8210 are iconic names, resurrected with 4G connectivity. But which of these modern retro phones offers the better experience? We're diving deep into a head-to-head comparison to help you decide which one deserves a spot in your pocket.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Nokia 8210 4G edges out the 3310 4G thanks to its slightly more powerful chipset and improved display. While both offer a nostalgic experience and reliable 4G, the 8210 provides a marginally smoother and more feature-rich package for a similar price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20 - APAC, EU, RUCIS | 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 40 - LATAM | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 12 | 2018, January. Released 2018, February |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 28 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 131.3 x 56.2 x 13.8 mm (5.17 x 2.21 x 0.54 in) | 117 x 52.4 x 13.4 mm (4.61 x 2.06 x 0.53 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Micro-SIM |
| Weight | 107 g (3.77 oz) | 88.1 g (3.10 oz) |
| | - | Flashlight |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~143 ppi density) | 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~167 ppi density) |
| Size | 2.8 inches, 24.3 cm2 (~32.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 2.4 inches, 17.8 cm2 (~29.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD | TFT |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | 1.0 GHz Cortex-A7 | - |
| Chipset | Unisoc T107 (22 nm) | - |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | Yes | Yes |
| Card slot | microSDHC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128MB 48MB RAM | 512MB 256MB RAM |
| Phonebook | Yes | Yes |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 0.3 MP | 2 MP |
| Video | Unspecified | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | No |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | No | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Games | Yes | Yes |
| Java | No | No |
| Messaging | SMS, MMS | SMS |
| | - | Audio/Video player |
| Battery |
|---|
| Music play | - | Up to 31 h |
| Stand-by | - | Up to 360 h (3G) |
| Talk time | - | Up to 8 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Ion 1450 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 1200 mAh, removable (BL-4UL) |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sand, Blue, Red | Azure, Yellow, Warm Red, Charcoa |
| Models | TA-1507, TA-1494, TA-1489, TA-1485, TA-1483 | - |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 100 EUR |
| SAR | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) | - |
Nokia 8210 4G
- Larger display
- Slightly better performance
- More modern design
- 4G connectivity
- Classic Nokia design
- Chipset still basic
- Camera quality is low
- Limited app support
Nokia 3310 4G
- Iconic design
- Extremely durable
- Excellent battery life
- Simple and easy to use
- 4G connectivity
- Smaller display
- Lower performance
- Camera quality is low
- Limited features
Display Comparison
The Nokia 8210 4G boasts a larger 2.8-inch QVGA display compared to the 3310 4G's 2.4-inch display. While both are TFT panels, the 8210's larger size and slightly improved resolution offer a more pleasant viewing experience for text and basic images.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature a basic VGA camera. Image quality is expected to be low on both devices, suitable only for very casual snapshots. Don't expect anything beyond basic functionality here.
Performance
The 8210 4G's Unisoc T107 chipset, though basic, provides a noticeable performance boost over the 3310 4G's unknown chipset. Expect slightly faster app loading and smoother navigation on the 8210. Both phones are primarily designed for calls and texts, not demanding apps.
Battery Life
Both phones offer excellent battery life, typical of feature phones. Expect several days of use on a single charge with moderate usage. The 8210 4G's slightly larger battery may provide a marginal advantage in longevity.
Buying Guide
The Nokia 8210 4G is ideal for those seeking a slightly more modern feature phone with a better screen and a bit more processing power. The Nokia 3310 4G is perfect for users prioritizing ultimate simplicity, legendary durability, and a truly classic Nokia feel, even if it means sacrificing some performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Are these phones good for gaming?
No, neither phone is suitable for gaming. They are designed for basic communication and offer limited processing power.
❓ Can I install apps on these phones?
Yes, both phones support basic apps, but don't expect a wide selection or high performance. They run on a simplified operating system.
❓ How durable are these phones?
Both are built to be durable, reflecting Nokia's reputation. The 3310 4G is arguably more robust due to its simpler design.