Nokia 8 V 5G UW vs OnePlus Nord N200 5G: Which 5G Phone Delivers More Performance?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing consistent performance and a slightly more refined experience, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW is the better choice. While the OnePlus Nord N200 5G offers a newer chipset, the Snapdragon 765G in the Nokia provides a noticeable advantage in CPU and GPU performance, making it better suited for demanding tasks and sustained usage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Nokia 8 V 5G UW | OnePlus Nord N200 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 46, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66, 71, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 2, 5, 66, 260, 261 Sub6/mmWave | 2, 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6 - USA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (4CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G 2.4/1.2 Gbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat15 800/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 2, 25, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Canada | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, November 09. Released 2020, November 12 | 2021, June 21 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, June 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 171.9 x 78.6 x 9 mm (6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 in) | 163.1 x 74.9 x 8.3 mm (6.42 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM (pre-installed) | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 230 g (8.11 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.49 inches, 102.2 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11, OxygenOS 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.43", 1.4µm, AF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.1 |
| Triple | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/240fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 24 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.9µm | 16 MP, f/2.1 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Meteor Gray | Blue Quantum |
| Models | - | DE2118, DE2117 |
| Price | About 590 EUR | About 170 EUR |
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
- More powerful Snapdragon 765G chipset
- Superior GPU performance for smoother graphics
- More efficient 7nm process for better battery life
- Older chipset generation
- May be slightly more expensive
OnePlus Nord N200 5G
- Newer Snapdragon 480 chipset
- Potentially lower price point
- Modern 5G connectivity
- Less powerful CPU and GPU
- Less efficient 8nm process
- May struggle with demanding tasks
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, a common cost-saving measure in this price bracket. The key difference lies under the hood: the Nokia 8 V 5G UW’s Snapdragon 765G has an Adreno 620 GPU, which will provide a smoother experience when rendering graphics, even if the display resolution is similar. While specific display specs (resolution, brightness) are missing, the GPU advantage of the Nokia suggests a more responsive visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Snapdragon 765G’s image signal processor (ISP) is significantly more capable than the 480’s. This means the Nokia 8 V 5G UW is likely to produce better-quality photos, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The ISP handles noise reduction, dynamic range, and overall image processing. While both phones likely feature multiple cameras, the Nokia’s superior processing power will likely result in more detailed and vibrant images. We can assume both phones will include a standard wide, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens, but the Nokia will extract more detail from the sensors.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW’s Snapdragon 765G (7nm) features a Kryo 475 prime core clocked at 2.4GHz, alongside a 2.2GHz gold core and six 1.8GHz silver cores. This contrasts with the OnePlus Nord N200 5G’s Snapdragon 480 (8nm) which has two 2.0GHz Kryo 460 cores and six 1.8GHz Kryo 460 cores. The 7nm process node of the 765G is more efficient, and the inclusion of a dedicated prime core gives the Nokia a clear edge in single-core performance. The Snapdragon 480, while newer, is designed for efficiency and basic functionality, not raw power. This translates to faster app loading times and smoother multitasking on the Nokia.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 18W wired charging, suggesting similar charging speeds. The actual battery capacity is unknown, but the Snapdragon 765G’s 7nm process contributes to better power efficiency. This means the Nokia 8 V 5G UW is likely to offer comparable, if not slightly better, battery life despite potentially having a similar capacity to the OnePlus Nord N200 5G. The more efficient chipset reduces power draw during everyday tasks, extending usage time between charges.
Buying Guide
Buy the Nokia 8 V 5G UW if you need a phone capable of handling more demanding applications, multitasking, and occasional gaming without significant slowdowns. Buy the OnePlus Nord N200 5G if you prioritize a slightly newer chipset and are primarily focused on basic smartphone tasks like browsing, social media, and light video streaming, and are on a very tight budget.