Nokia 8 V 5G UW vs. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025): A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 chipset, built on a more efficient 4nm process, combined with the blazing-fast 68W charging and exceptionally bright 1870 nit display, outweigh the Nokia 8 V 5G UW’s older hardware.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Nokia 8 V 5G UW | Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 46, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 2, 5, 66, 260, 261 Sub6/mmWave | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (4CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G 2.4/1.2 Gbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, November 09. Released 2020, November 12 | 2025, April 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2025, April 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), silicone polymer (eco leather) back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 171.9 x 78.6 x 9 mm (6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 in) | 162.2 x 74.8 x 8.3 mm (6.39 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM (pre-installed) | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 230 g (8.11 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~444 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Zeiss optics, Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.43", 1.4µm, AF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/240fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 24 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.9µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 68W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Meteor Gray | Pantone: Gibraltar sea, Surf the Web |
| Models | - | XT2517-1 |
| Price | About 590 EUR | $ 299.99 / C$ 368.17 |
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
- Potentially lower price point (depending on availability)
- Proven 5G connectivity
- Familiar Nokia software experience
- Older Snapdragon 765G chipset
- Slow 18W charging
- Likely lower display brightness
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025)
- Faster Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4nm)
- Blazing-fast 68W wired and 15W wireless charging
- Exceptionally bright 1870 nit display
- Excellent battery life (10:05h active use)
- May be slightly more expensive
- Motorola software can include bloatware
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) immediately stands out with its measured peak brightness of 1870 nits, a substantial leap over what the Nokia 8 V 5G UW likely offered (spec not provided, but typically around 600-700 nits for its class). This translates to significantly better outdoor visibility. While panel technology details are missing for both, the brightness difference is a key advantage for the Motorola. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW’s display, while adequate, will struggle in direct sunlight. We can assume both use LCD panels given the price points, but the Motorola’s brightness is a game changer.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs for either device, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) likely benefits from newer image signal processing (ISP) capabilities within the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW’s camera performance was generally considered average for its time. We can assume both phones will include a standard suite of lenses, but the Motorola’s newer chipset will likely deliver better dynamic range and low-light performance. The absence of detailed sensor information prevents a more granular analysis.
Performance
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4nm), a more modern and efficient chipset compared to the Nokia 8 V 5G UW’s Snapdragon 765G (7nm). The 4nm process node of the 6 Gen 3 provides better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. While the Nokia 8 V 5G UW’s Kryo 475 CPU has a slightly higher peak clock speed on its prime core (2.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz on the Moto G Stylus), the Cortex-A78 cores in the Motorola offer superior single-core performance. The Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 also benefits from architectural improvements, resulting in a smoother overall user experience. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW’s older chipset will show its age in demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) boasts a significant advantage in charging speed with its 68W wired and 15W wireless capabilities, compared to the Nokia 8 V 5G UW’s 18W wired charging. The Motorola’s active use score of 10:05h indicates excellent battery life, likely due to the efficiency of the 4nm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3. While the Nokia 8 V 5G UW’s battery capacity is unknown, the slower charging speed and older chipset suggest it will take considerably longer to fully recharge. The Motorola’s fast charging is a major convenience factor.
Buying Guide
Buy the Nokia 8 V 5G UW if you prioritize a proven track record and can find it at a deeply discounted price, accepting compromises in charging speed and display quality. Buy the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) if you value fast charging, a vibrant and bright display, and a more modern, power-efficient chipset for improved long-term performance and battery life.