The Nokia 6.2, released in 2019, represents a focus on durability and a clean Android experience. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G, arriving later, targets the burgeoning 5G market with a more powerful chipset and faster charging. This comparison dissects the key differences between these two devices, helping you determine which best suits your needs in 2024 and beyond.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 750G chipset delivers a noticeable performance boost over the Nokia 6.2’s Snapdragon 636, and the 33W fast charging is a game-changer compared to the Nokia’s 10W charging. The addition of 5G connectivity further solidifies its position as the more future-proof option.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - ROW | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - ROW | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - IN | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, September 05. Released 2019, October 17 | 2020, November 26 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, December 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.3 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 165.4 x 76.8 x 9 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, HDR10 | IPS LCD, HDR10, 120Hz, 450 nits (typ) |
| | Always-on display | - |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM636 Snapdragon 636 (14 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 509 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10, Android One | Android 10, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (excl. India) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 33W wired, 100% in 58 min |
| Type | Li-Po 3500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4820 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Ceramic Black, Ice | Gray, Blue, Red/Mint |
| Models | TA-1200, TA-1198, TA-1201, TA-1187 | M2007J17C |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 370 EUR |
| SAR | 1.04 W/kg (head) 1.05 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.97 W/kg (head) 1.42 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality |
Noise -91.0dB / Crosstalk -94.8dB | - |
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 73h
| - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1525:1 (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
Voice 65dB / Noise 70dB / Ring 79dB
| - |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 114947 (v7), 140736 (v8)
GeekBench: 4882 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 5.7fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Nokia 6.2
- Clean, stock Android experience
- Solid build quality (typical of Nokia)
- Respectable battery endurance (73h)
- Outdated Snapdragon 636 chipset
- Slow 10W charging
- Lacks 5G connectivity
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G
- Faster Snapdragon 750G 5G chipset
- 33W fast charging (58 min to 100%)
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- MIUI software can be bloated
- Potentially less long-term software support than Nokia
Display Comparison
The Nokia 6.2 boasts a display with a measured peak brightness of 580 nits and a 1525:1 contrast ratio. While respectable, this is likely surpassed by the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G, which, typical of Xiaomi’s offerings, likely prioritizes vibrant colors and high brightness. The Nokia 6.2’s contrast ratio, while nominal, suggests a standard IPS panel. The Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G’s display technology is not specified, but given its market positioning, it likely features a similar IPS LCD, potentially with a higher refresh rate (a common feature in Redmi Note series).
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature a 'Photo / Video' camera setup, but details are sparse. Without specific sensor information, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. However, given Xiaomi’s tendency to include higher-resolution sensors, the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G likely has an advantage in image detail. The Nokia 6.2 likely focuses on software optimization for image quality, while the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G may lean towards more saturated colors and aggressive sharpening. The absence of details on OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) for either device suggests reliance on software stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Nokia 6.2 utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, a 14nm processor with an octa-core CPU configuration (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 260 Silver). The Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G steps up to the Snapdragon 750G, built on a more efficient 8nm process. This translates to improved performance and thermal efficiency. The 750G’s CPU (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) offers a higher peak clock speed and a more modern architecture, resulting in faster app loading times and smoother multitasking. The 8nm process also means less heat generation under load, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The Nokia 6.2 achieves an endurance rating of 73 hours, indicating solid battery life for its time. However, the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G compensates for any potential battery capacity difference with its significantly faster 33W wired charging, achieving a full charge in just 58 minutes. The Nokia 6.2’s 10W charging is comparatively slow, requiring considerably longer to reach 100%. This difference in charging speed is a major convenience factor for the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G.
Buying Guide
Buy the Nokia 6.2 if you prioritize a simple, stock Android experience and long-term software support, and are willing to compromise on performance and charging speed. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G if you need faster performance for gaming or multitasking, want significantly quicker charging, and desire 5G connectivity for future network compatibility. The Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G is the better option for users who value modern features and speed.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 750G in the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G powerful enough for demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
Yes, the Snapdragon 750G is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty Mobile at medium to high settings with stable frame rates. While it's not a flagship-level chipset, it provides a significant performance upgrade over the Snapdragon 636 in the Nokia 6.2, offering a smoother gaming experience.
❓ How does Xiaomi's MIUI software compare to the stock Android experience on the Nokia 6.2?
MIUI is a heavily customized Android skin known for its features and customization options. However, it can also be more resource-intensive and include pre-installed bloatware. The Nokia 6.2 offers a clean, stock Android experience with minimal modifications, providing a faster and more streamlined user interface.
❓ Will the Nokia 6.2 continue to receive software updates and security patches?
Nokia historically provides good software support for its devices. However, given the Nokia 6.2's age, its update cycle is likely nearing its end. The Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G, being a newer device, will likely receive updates for a longer period, though Xiaomi's update schedule can be less predictable than Nokia's.
